Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wedabro/bro-skills --skill speckit.testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wedabro/bro-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wedabro/bro-skills/speckit.tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00343 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
🎯 Mission
Make sure the implementation has full test coverage and passes 100%.
📥 Input
- Source code (implemented files)
.agents/specs/[feature]/tasks.md(completed tasks).agents/specs/[feature]/spec.md(success criteria)
📋 Protocol
- Test Plan: From tasks.md (completed) → list functions/routes to test.
- Write Tests: For each function/route:
- Happy path (valid input → correct output)
- Error path (error input → error handling correct)
- Edge case (boundary values, empty, null)
- Run Tests:
docker compose exec [service] npm testor equivalent. - Coverage Report:
📊 Test Coverage Report ═══════════════════════ Files Tested: 12/15 (80%) Tests Passed: 45/48 (93.7%) Tests Failed: 3 ─────────────────────── Untested: src/api/payment.ts, src/utils/cache.ts, src/hooks/useAuth.ts - List failed tests with error details.
📤 Output
- Test files (theo convention:
*.test.ts,*.spec.ts) - File:
.agents/memory/test-report.md
🚫 Guard Rails
- DO NOT skip error path tests — must also test failing cases.
- DON'T mock too much — prefer integration tests for API routes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 40 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 7675c7996740
speckit.tester is a skill published in the GitHub repository wedabro/bro-skills (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 343 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
random-user-post-batch
Returns multiple randomly generated fake user profiles in a single request. Each call consumes count units of quota. Maximum 50 users per request.
random-user-get-random-user
Returns a randomly generated fake user profile.
offensive-fuzzing
Practical offensive fuzzing methodology covering target identification, fuzzer selection (AFL++, libFuzzer, Honggfuzz, Boofuzz, syzkaller), harness writing, corpus curation, mutation strategies, coverage measurement, and crash triage. Use when setting up or running fuzz campaigns against any target: file parsers…
winui-ui-testing
Automated UI testing for Windows desktop apps — generate a batch test script with the winapp ui UI Automation harness, run all tests in one pass, read results. Covers element assertions, interactions, value checking (TextBox, ComboBox, ToggleSwitch), keyboard shortcuts and typing (send-keys), hover, drag-and-drop…
offensive-race-condition
Race condition (TOCTOU) testing checklist: identifying timing windows, Burp Suite Turbo Intruder, Last-Byte sync technique, rate limit bypass, double-spend attacks, and concurrent request exploitation. Use for web app race condition testing or bug bounty time-of-check-to-time-of-use bugs.
create-test-plan
Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/ .md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios"…