Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/weiyi88/cc-code/agent-to-mvpnpx skills add weiyi88/cc-code --skill agent-to-mvpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/weiyi88/cc-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/agent-to-mvp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/agent-to-mvp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/agent-to-mvp.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00090 | $0.02656 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01328 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00531 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
agent-to-mvp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
agent-to-mvp — 三 agent × cc-code 驱动 MVP 生命周期编排器
手动触发：仅由用户显式输入
/cc-code:agent-to-mvp调用，不在会话中自动加载。 校准铁律：每一个阶段完成后，必须先执行/cc-code:cc-code校准当前状态（重读Agent.md/status.md，重锁角色与坐标），确认无误后再进入下一阶段。未校准禁止推进。 串行铁律：严守 PM → Architect → Dev → QA 顺序，由.cc_code/active/Agent.md锁定当前角色，禁止跨角色思考与跳序。
前置检查（启动时一次性）
- 确认项目根存在
.cc_code/（否则提示先/cc-code:init）。 - 确认三 agent 可用：
prd-plan/dev/qa。 - 确认测试基建：读
project.md§六「测试基建契约」取测试根 / glob / 运行命令。缺失或未填实则把「补齐测试基建 + 回填project.md§六」作为 Dev 阶段首个任务。 - 索引体检（⭐0.10.0，静默）：
codegraph status --json读三字段 ——initialized:false→ 报一行（⛔ 不自动重建）；pendingChanges非 0 → 静默codegraph sync；reindexRecommended:true→ 报一行建议。CLI 未装则静默跳过，全流程照跑（精准回归降级为全量）。⛔ 健康时一个字都不提。 - 执行
/cc-code:cc-code完成会话开启协议，锁定当前阶段与角色。
生命周期总览
启动校准 → ①PM → 校准 → ②Architect → 校准 → ③Dev → 校准 → ④QA → 校准
│
┌─────────┴──────────┐
▼ ▼
FAIL→回Dev(≤3) PASS→阶段结算→校准
│ │
3轮仍FAIL→升级 ▼
(回prd-plan/人) 还有阶段? →回①
全PASS → MVP收口
阶段执行规范
每阶段严格按「读 / 做 / 跑 / 输出 / 写」执行，完成即校准。
① PM 段（agent: prd-plan，PM 视角）
| 项 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 读 | status.md, 用户需求（禁读 src/、project.md） |
| 做 | 模糊需求→精确规范；定义 P0/P1；拆交互场景；覆盖五态（正常/加载/完成/错误/空） |
| 跑 | Agent 工具 subagent_type=prd-plan |
| 输出 | PRD + 交互矩阵 + 前端规格 |
| 写 | prd.md, ux.md |
| ✅ 完成后 | 执行 /cc-code:cc-code 校准 |
② Architect 段（agent: prd-plan，Architect 视角）
| 项 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 读 | status, prd, ux（禁读 src 业务码） |
| 做 | 技术选型/DB设计/API定义/目录；列每阶段验收断言清单；标 ⚠️ Needs Decision |
| 跑 | Agent 工具 subagent_type=prd-plan（切 Architect 视角） |
| 输出 | 实现计划文档（Summary/Scope/Design/边缘案例/风险/Rollout） |
| 写 | project.md, docs/plans/phaseN-plan.md |
| ✅ 完成后 | 执行 /cc-code:cc-code 校准 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 132 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A bf7831537897
agent-to-mvp is a skill published in the GitHub repository weiyi88/cc-code (5 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 2,656 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
state-machine
Task lifecycle state transitions with validation gates. Defines states, triggers, and required proofs.
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
mutation-testing
Mutation testing patterns for verifying test effectiveness. Use when analyzing branch code to find weak or missing tests.
planning
Planning work in small, known-good increments. Use when starting significant work or breaking down complex tasks.
testing
Testing patterns for behavior-driven tests. Use when writing tests or test factories.
davinci-define
Apply the 7 Da Vincian Principles to define problems, set direction, and reflect on life choices. Use for career decisions, goal setting, life planning, or when you need to clarify what the real question is before solving it.