Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add weiyi88/cc-code --skill just-do-itgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/weiyi88/cc-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/just-do-it)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/just-do-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/just-do-it/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/just-do-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/weiyi88/cc-code/just-do-it.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00933 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
just-do-it scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
just-do-it — 小改动直通车（零规划零责任）
纯执行器：主人一句话说清的小活（微小改动 / 单个页面 / 小工具），不规划、不定位、不锁角色，dev 写完 qa 验，记一笔就结束。 零责任声明：不做断言对账、不做全量回归、不更新 status/milestone——快，是拿深度换的。 与 agent-feature 的分界：需求一句话说不清、要动契约/动架构、要追溯既有断言 → 拒绝执行，指路
/cc-code:plan-feature。
前置检查（启动时一次性）
- 确认双 agent 可用：
dev/qa。 - 需求可一句话说清（说不清 → 拒跑指路规划，⛔ 不现场推需求）。
- ⛔ 不需要
.cc_code/、不读 prd/ux/project、不读 status.md——需求唯一来源 = 主人原话。
运行逻辑
主人一句话需求
│
▼
① dev 直接改 + 能跑的自检（lint / build / test，有就跑）
│
▼
② qa 只拿「主人原话」当尺子验一遍
│
┌──┴───────────┐
▼ ▼
FAIL→回dev PASS
(≤2轮) │
│ ▼
仍FAIL→报告 ③ gates.md 追加完整记录 → 结束
① Dev 段（agent: dev）
| 项 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 读 | 仅需求涉及的代码文件（最小集） |
| 做 | 只按主人原话实现；⛔ 不顺手重构无关代码、不擅自扩大范围 |
| 自检 | 项目有 lint / build / test 就跑，没有就跳过（不补基建） |
| 输出 | 改动文件清单 + 每个文件干了啥 + 自检结果 |
② QA 段（agent: qa）
| 项 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 尺子 | 只有主人原话（⛔ 不读 prd 断言、不做追溯矩阵） |
| 验 | 需求点逐条过一遍；能跑则实测，跑不了则代码走查 |
| 输出 | Verdict（PASS / FAIL 清单） |
| 回环 | FAIL → 主控原样喂回 dev，≤2 轮；仍 FAIL → 直接报告交人，⛔ 不硬修 |
③ gates.md 记录（唯一善后）
落点：项目有 .cc_code/active/gates.md → 追加到末尾；没有 → 项目根建 gates.md。只追加，⛔ 不改历史段落。
每段必须五件套：
## just-do-it YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm
- 需求原话：<主人原话，一字不改>
- 改动文件：<文件清单>
- 每个文件干了啥：<逐文件一行说明>
- qa 结论：<PASS / FAIL 要点 + 复测轮数>
- 遗留：<没做完 / 没验到的，没有就写「无」>
铁律
- 不碰：status.md / milestone-log.md / prd.md / ux.md / 契约文档。
- 不负责：不改回滚方案、不做回归承诺、不测无关面——记录在案即免责。
- 中途零确认：跑完一次性报告结果；只有「需求说不清」和「2 轮仍 FAIL」两种情况才打断主人。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago First seen · 77 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 89ea8b803120
just-do-it is a skill published in the GitHub repository weiyi88/cc-code (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-creator
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
mutation-testing
Mutation testing patterns for verifying test effectiveness. Use when analyzing branch code to find weak or missing tests.
testing
Testing patterns for behavior-driven tests. Use when writing tests or test factories.
test-design-reviewer
Evaluates test quality using Dave Farley's 8 properties. Use when reviewing tests, assessing test suite quality, or analyzing test effectiveness against TDD best practices.
tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow. Use for ALL code changes - features, bug fixes, refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.
playwright-python
Playwright Python AI test generation instructions based on official documentation. Use when writing or reviewing Playwright tests in Python.