Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WellApp-ai/Well --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WellApp-ai/WellWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00517 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00207 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
Systematically review code for quality, conventions, and potential issues.
When to Use
- Before committing changes (auto-triggered)
- Reviewing others' PRs
- Self-review before pushing
- Pre-push validation (Phase 0)
Phase 0: Pre-Push Validation
Before reviewing code, ensure build passes:
-
npm run typecheck- No type errors -
npm run lint- No lint errors - No console.log in changed files
- Tests pass (if applicable):
npm run test
If any check fails, fix before proceeding to code review.
Quick check command:
npm run typecheck && npm run lint
Check for console.log:
git diff --cached --name-only | xargs grep -l "console.log" 2>/dev/null
Review Checklist
Hard Rules Check
- No
anytype usage - No console.log statements
- Components under 200 lines
- No inline styles (Tailwind only)
- No arbitrary values (
px-[13px]) - API follows 3-layer pattern
Code Quality Check
- Clear variable/function names
- No duplicated code
- Proper error handling
- Types are specific (not
unknowneverywhere)
Conventions Check
- Follows existing patterns in codebase
- Imports organized correctly
- File in correct location (feature folder)
Security Check
- No hardcoded secrets/API keys
- No exposed sensitive data
- Proper input validation
Output Format
Present findings as:
Code Review Summary
Files Changed: [count] Issues Found: [count by severity]
Critical (must fix)
-
file.ts:L42- [issue description]
Warnings (should fix)
-
file.ts:L15- [issue description]
Suggestions (nice to have)
-
file.ts:L88- [suggestion]
Approved
- No blocking issues found
Proceed with commit? (yes / fix issues first)
Auto-Trigger
This skill is automatically invoked before every commit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 2127b0c97dc8
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository WellApp-ai/Well (345 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 517 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ci-orchestrator
Run a CI-like pipeline locally (format, lint, vet, static-analysis, tests) and summarize per-step results with remediation guidance.
spine-review
API and backend code review — REST conventions, auth, validation, error handling, pagination, rate limiting, test coverage. Use when asked to "review this API", "code review", "review backend", or "pre-launch backend check".
code-review
Review code for quality, bugs, security issues, and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, or improve code.
gitlab-merge-request-review
Review and merge GitLab merge requests via the gitlab-api MCP server — by default the MRs assigned to you or where you are a reviewer, optionally scoped to a project, group, or the whole instance. Read an MR, gate it on a green pipeline (pipeline → jobs → job log), then approve, accept/merge, or set…
check-abi-compatibility
Review a diff, branch, commit, or pull request in a C/C++ shared library (built for Linux ELF with GCC or Clang) for binary and source compatibility with existing consumers. Use when asked to review a PR for binary compatibility, to check whether a change will break existing consumers or already-compiled applications…
API Compatibility and Test Gap Review
Detect breaking API contract changes, DTO modifications without compatibility handling, and missing tests for changed API boundaries.