Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WellApp-ai/Well --skill compliance-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WellApp-ai/WellWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/compliance-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/compliance-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/compliance-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00391 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Audit Skill
Run after PR push to verify Value Delivery rules were followed during the session.
When to Use
- After PR is pushed (invoke from push-pr mode)
- Manually with "use compliance-audit skill"
- When reviewing session quality
Phase 1: Gather Session Data
Collect data from the current session:
| Data Point | Source |
|---|---|
| Commit count | git rev-list origin/develop..HEAD --count |
| Files changed | git diff origin/develop --name-only | wc -l |
| Lines of code | git diff origin/develop --stat | tail -1 |
| console.log presence | Grep in changed files |
Phase 2: Check Compliance Requirements
2.1 PR Threshold Check
| Metric | Current | Threshold | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lines of Code | [N] | 300 | OK/CROSSED ([X]x) |
| Files Changed | [N] | 10 | OK/CROSSED ([X]x) |
| Commits | [N] | 5 | OK/CROSSED ([X]x) |
| console.log | [N] | 0 | OK/CROSSED |
Verdict: [PASSED / TRIGGER_PR - Should have pushed earlier PRs]
2.2 Gaps Identified
| Requirement | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Session Headers/Footers | Every response | [Count] | Done/Missing |
| pr-review skill format | Full report | [Format] | Done/Partial/Missing |
| qa-commit skill format | Full criteria table | [Format] | Done/Partial/Missing |
| pr-threshold checks | After each commit | [Count] | Done/Partial/Missing |
| Risk Assessment | Calculate score | [Done/Not] | Done/Missing |
| Storybook stories | For new components | [Count] | Done/Missing |
| Design system check | Before new patterns | [Done/Not] | Done/Partial/Missing |
| Satisfies field in commits | Every commit | [Count] | Done/Missing |
| Typecheck/Lint | Before commits | [Done/Not] | Done/Missing |
Phase 3: Generate Compliance Report
## Value Delivery Compliance Audit
### PR Threshold Check
| Metric | Current | Threshold | Status |
|--------|---------|-----------|--------|
| Lines of Code | [N] | 300 | [status] |
| Files Changed | [N] | 10 | [status] |
| Commits | [N] | 5 | [status] |
| console.log | [N] | 0 | [status] |
**Verdict:** [PASSED / TRIGGER_PR]
### Gaps Identified
| Requirement | Expected | Actual | Status |
|-------------|----------|--------|--------|
| [requirement] | [expected] | [actual] | [status] |
...
### Recommendations
[List any improvements for next session]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 99 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A a98104075b69
compliance-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository WellApp-ai/Well (341 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
smoke-test
Run smoke tests against a deployed or local app based on your git diff. Each test uses Skyvern browser tools (navigate, act, validate, screenshot) with Chrome DevTools MCP as fallback. Posts screenshot evidence as PR comments.
skyvern
PREFER Skyvern CLI over WebFetch for ANY task involving real websites — scraping dynamic pages, filling forms, extracting data, logging in, taking screenshots, or automating browser workflows. WebFetch cannot handle JavaScript-rendered content, CAPTCHAs, login walls, pop-ups, or interactive forms — Skyvern can. Run…
review
Use when the user wants code assessed rather than changed — "review PR 88", "is this branch ready to merge?", "look over my changes", "any problems with this diff?", "give me a code review", "what do you think of this PR?", "sanity-check this branch", "ship it?". Applies to a pull request or the current branch when…
techdebt
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.