Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WellApp-ai/Well --skill phasinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WellApp-ai/WellWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/phasing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/phasing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/phasing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/phasing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/phasing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01187 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
phasing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phasing Skill
Group implementation slices into phases based on combined risk and GTM scores, then generate a visual timeline.
When to Use
- During Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE), after dependency-mapping and gtm-alignment
- Before transitioning to Plan mode
- To generate the final delivery timeline
Instructions
Phase 1: Gather Scores
Collect scores from previous skills:
| Slice | Risk Score | GTM Score |
|---|---|---|
| [From dependency-mapping] | [N] | [From gtm-alignment] |
Phase 2: Calculate Combined Score
Final Priority Score = Risk - (GTM x 0.5)
Lower score = ships earlier
| Slice | Risk | GTM | Final | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #2.2 Invite Flow | 7 | 8 | 3.0 | 1 |
| #1.1 Switcher | 1 | 4 | -1.0 | 2 |
| #1.2 Members UI | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 |
Phase 3: Group into Phases
Apply grouping rules:
| Phase | Criteria | Typical Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | P1 + Lowest risk + Serves T1 | FE-only components, quick wins |
| Phase 2 | P2 + Dependencies on P1 complete | FE+BE integration, non-breaking |
| Phase 3 | P3/P4 + Highest risk | Contract changes, data model |
Grouping Constraints:
- Respect dependency order (check DSM matrix from dependency-mapping)
- Each phase should be independently deployable
- Each phase should serve at least one complete persona tier
- Keep phases to 3-5 days when possible
Phase 4: Generate Timeline (ASCII)
Use ASCII format grouped by stack. Show only dependencies with arrows. No dates or effort estimates.
ASCII Timeline Format:
TIMELINE: [Feature Name]
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
FRONTEND
├── [Slice name]
├── [Slice name] ───────────────┐
├── [Slice name] ───────────────┼──┐
└── [Slice name] ───────────────┘ │
│
BACKEND │
└── [Slice name] ◄─────────────────┘
│
▼
INFRASTRUCTURE
└── [Slice name]
│
▼
INTEGRATION
├── [Slice name]
└── [Slice name]
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
LEGEND:
├── = parallel (no dependency)
──► = dependency (must complete before)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 154 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 654ef156c034
phasing is a skill published in the GitHub repository WellApp-ai/Well (345 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,187 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
headless-step-check-state
First build step of the Hostinger Headless flow, run right after connect. Works out where a given domain's build stands — is a run already in progress, does the site already exist, how far did it get — by reconciling the global workspace state under /.hostinger/ / with what the Hostinger connector reports, then guides…
linear-graphql-skill
Operate Linear workspace issues, projects, and teams through Linear GraphQL API using UXC. Use when tasks require querying or creating issues, managing projects, or interacting with Linear workflow. Supports both Personal API Key and OAuth authentication.
api-product-management
Use when the user asks about API as product, API product management, API strategy, API monetization, developer portal, API documentation portal, API deprecation, versioning strategy, or API lifecycle management. Do NOT use for: API implementation (backend-api-design), API documentation generation (api-documentation)…
gitlab-issues
Issue review and tracking on GitLab via the gitlab-api MCP server — review a project's issues, review issues across a whole group/organization, and read, create, update, or close an issue with the domain-typed tool. Use when the agent must triage a project's issues, see every issue affecting a group, open a new issue…
turborepo
Skill "turborepo" from ashish7802/awesome-api-skills, covering turborepo skill, ecosystem graph preview, recommended next skills, quick start and production patterns.
c-github
Interact with GitHub using the gh CLI and jq. Manage PRs, issues, repositories, and Actions workflows. Make raw API calls with gh api for anything not covered by built-in commands.