Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WellApp-ai/Well --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WellApp-ai/WellWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wellapp-ai/well/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wellapp-ai/well/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.02287 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00915 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:8080/health --max-time 5 How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 361 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Skill
Automated technical validation before commits. Uses ReadLints for lint/type errors and Shell for running validation commands.
When to Use
- Before every commit (invoked by commit.mdc)
- Before pushing PR (invoked by push-pr.mdc Phase 1)
- Manually with "use pr-review skill"
Phase 0: Runtime Check (Auto-Resolve)
Verify development environment is ready. Auto-resolve safe issues, prompt for risky ones.
0.1 Dependencies Check
Check if dependencies are fresh:
# Check if node_modules exists
ls -d node_modules 2>/dev/null
# Check if package-lock.json is newer than node_modules
find package-lock.json -newer node_modules 2>/dev/null
If node_modules missing or stale (auto-resolve):
npm install
Wait for install to complete before proceeding.
0.2 Docker Containers
Check if required containers are running:
docker ps --filter name=well_ --format "{{.Names}}: {{.Status}}"
Expected: well_postgres and well_hasura running
If not running (auto-resolve):
cd apps/api/docker && docker compose up -d
Wait up to 30 seconds for containers to be healthy.
0.3 Database Migrations
Check for pending migrations:
cd apps/api && npm run mikro:up -- --dry-run 2>&1 | head -5
If migrations pending (WARN - do NOT auto-run):
Database migrations may be pending.
Run manually if needed: cd apps/api && npm run mikro:up
Continue without running migrations? (y/n)
Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.
0.4 API Server (port 8080)
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:8080/health --max-time 5
Expected: HTTP 200
If not responding:
- Check if process exists:
lsof -i :8080 - If NO process, prompt user to start:
API server not running on port 8080. Start with: npm run dev (in apps/api) - If process EXISTS but unresponsive, ASK user:
API server on port 8080 is unresponsive (process exists but not responding). Options: A) Kill process and restart (recommended) B) Skip and continue anyway C) Abort commit Reply with A, B, or C. - If user chooses A:
Then prompt user to restart:lsof -ti :8080 | xargs kill -9 2>/dev/nullcd apps/api && npm run dev
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 361 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 06ecf53632c4
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository WellApp-ai/Well (346 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,287 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ci-orchestrator
Run a CI-like pipeline locally (format, lint, vet, static-analysis, tests) and summarize per-step results with remediation guidance.
spine-review
API and backend code review — REST conventions, auth, validation, error handling, pagination, rate limiting, test coverage. Use when asked to "review this API", "code review", "review backend", or "pre-launch backend check".
code-review
Review code for quality, bugs, security issues, and suggest improvements. Use when asked to review, audit, or improve code.
gitlab-merge-request-review
Review and merge GitLab merge requests via the gitlab-api MCP server — by default the MRs assigned to you or where you are a reviewer, optionally scoped to a project, group, or the whole instance. Read an MR, gate it on a green pipeline (pipeline → jobs → job log), then approve, accept/merge, or set…
check-abi-compatibility
Review a diff, branch, commit, or pull request in a C/C++ shared library (built for Linux ELF with GCC or Clang) for binary and source compatibility with existing consumers. Use when asked to review a PR for binary compatibility, to check whether a change will break existing consumers or already-compiled applications…
API Compatibility and Test Gap Review
Detect breaking API contract changes, DTO modifications without compatibility handling, and missing tests for changed API boundaries.