Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills --skill triton-ascend-performance-improvementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills/triton-ascend-performance-improvement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills/triton-ascend-performance-improvement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills/triton-ascend-performance-improvement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills/triton-ascend-performance-improvement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills/triton-ascend-performance-improvement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01126 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00563 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
triton-ascend-performance-improvement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 88 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A afe73dc7f4eb
triton-ascend-performance-improvement is a skill published in the GitHub repository wenyi-li/awesome-agent-kernel-skills (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,126 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
trulens-diagnosis
Diagnose low evaluation scores and generate actionable improvement recommendations.
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
Self-Reflective Research
Draft a research report, then critique and improve it: assess weaknesses, decide whether revision is warranted, and produce an improved version. Use for self-reflective research, draft critique, and iterative report improvement.
skills-eval
Evaluate Claude skill quality through auditing. Use when reviewing or auditing skills.
sillytavern-iterator
A writing workflow that takes work through drafting, review, revision, polishing, and finalising. It also uses checks such as reading error signals, searching for answers, and testing assumptions.
theme-alchemy
A Chinese-language problem-solving framework that presents software work as five stages of technical growth, from building fundamentals to handling complex problems. It also includes a seven-point checklist for reading failures, searching, checking assumptions, isolating issues, and changing direction.