agent-acceptance-gate

agent-acceptance-gate is a skill for Claude Code from WenyuChiou/agent-collab-skills. It costs 31 tokens per session (920 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A final check for work produced by several coding agents before it is merged or pushed. It gives one PASS, FAIL, or RETRY decision for each task and the full round.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify multi-agent work before committing, pushing, or merging. It checks the criteria recorded in the project plan.
Why use it?
It replaces scattered manual checks with a defined set of success tests. It can catch inconsistencies between documents and other risks before release.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the agent-collab-workspace plugin — 7 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to verify multi-agent work before committing, pushing, or merging. It checks the criteria recorded in the project plan.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add WenyuChiou/agent-collab-skills --skill agent-acceptance-gate
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WenyuChiou/agent-collab-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agent-collab-workspace, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-acceptance-gate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agent-acceptance-gate

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wenyuchiou/agent-collab-skills/agent-acceptance-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 920 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.00920
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00460
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00184
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00092

Measured 6d ago against content hash f5d41044d4e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-acceptance-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/agent-acceptance-gate/SKILL.md · 107 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

agent-acceptance-gate

Run the final read-only verification step for a multi-agent round. The gate checks declared criteria and produces acceptance evidence. It never merges, commits, retries, or silently converts a decline, cancellation, timeout, or failure into success.

Inputs

  • current provider-neutral plan and success criteria;
  • validated TaskCheckpoint and latest PolicyDecision;
  • task results, evidence references, and raw-log paths;
  • reconciliation report;
  • repository diff and project-specific verification commands;
  • prior human decision records, if any.

Historical provider fields may be read for migration only. Current checks use task IDs and roles (primary-agent, delegated-executor, reviewer, and synthesizer).

Mandatory preset routing

Run the matching preset when a staged diff:

  • touches multiple locale variants of the same document stem;
  • adds entries to a catalog; or
  • changes a model-and-benchmark claim.

The bundled preset names are multi-locale-mirror-sync, catalog-entry-add, and fact-check-frontier-models.

Presets encode additional failure-mode checks; they do not replace independent review or factual source verification. If a preset cannot run, report a blocker or explicit degraded state. Never claim PASS.

Workflow

  1. Validate the plan, checkpoint, and policy. Unreadable configured policy is a fail-closed blocker.
  2. Inventory all tasks and required artifacts. Missing, null, declined, cancelled, timeout, degraded, and failed states remain distinct.
  3. Verify each declared success criterion with a deterministic command, artifact check, or explicit manual-check requirement. Never invent missing criteria.
  4. Compare changed files with declared task scopes and record unexplained drift as FAIL.
  5. Check structured statuses, claimed tests, evidence references, reconciliation blockers, and unresolved high-severity risks.
  6. Run triggered presets and applicable project invariants. For external facts, cite authoritative sources and mark whether evidence was locally verified.
  7. Evaluate canonical policy after the gate cycle. Respect v2 action/slice/goal scope and eligible automatic slice continuation; v1 behavior is unchanged.
  8. Write a new immutable acceptance evidence record. Do not overwrite a prior run or human decision.
  9. Report acceptance to the primary-agent and user. The host checks existing authorization for delivery; do not demand a fresh approval solely because review, session, or slice changed. A genuinely new human gate still needs a separate recorded decision bound to the specific affected action.

Read the full file on GitHub · 107 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed · +2 lines · -2 tokens per session f5d41044d4e0
  2. 7d ago Changed · -380 lines · -5 tokens per session 77e024d99b60
  3. 11d ago First seen · 485 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A d50dcb1eb061

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-acceptance-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository WenyuChiou/agent-collab-skills (26 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 920 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

critical-code-reviewer

Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.

posit-dev/skills · 67 tokens

review-work

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent · 63 tokens

one-way-door

Flags irreversible decisions before commit. Use for data models, infra, auth boundaries, API contracts, event schemas, CI/CD.

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism · 29 tokens

map-codebase

Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to "map…

tobihagemann/turbo · 106 tokens

reply-to-pr-threads

Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".

tobihagemann/turbo · 71 tokens

code-review-web

Review web application code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and stack-specific anti-patterns. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review code, debug a production issue, investigate a build failure, audit security, or check a PR before merging. Triggers on code review, review my code, debug…

rampstackco/claude-skills · 121 tokens