Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add WesleySmits/agent-skills --skill pr-linter-enforcergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WesleySmits/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wesleysmits/agent-skills/pr-linter-enforcer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wesleysmits/agent-skills/pr-linter-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wesleysmits/agent-skills/pr-linter-enforcer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wesleysmits/agent-skills/pr-linter-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wesleysmits/agent-skills/pr-linter-enforcer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01723 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00689 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00345 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
enforcing-code-linting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 292 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 216c876f394e
enforcing-code-linting is a skill published in the GitHub repository WesleySmits/agent-skills (7 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,723 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Use when reviewing code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, or adherence to best practices. Provides structured code review with severity levels and actionable feedback.
code-coherence-review
Reviews code and plans for logic coherence, correctness, and structural integrity.
reviewer-architect-adversarial
Adversarial plan review — structural validation and assumption attack on grill artifacts before implementation begins.
code-quality-review
Reviews code and plans against the project's coding rules.
review-loop
Two-mode review loop — single reviewer per epic, three reviewers for full branch.
review
Review current code changes for bugs, regressions, test gaps, and project-guideline violations.