Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Whatsonyourmind/oraclaw --skill oraclaw-ensemblegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Whatsonyourmind/oraclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-ensemble)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-ensemble"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-ensemble/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-ensemble"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-ensemble.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00579 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
oraclaw-ensemble scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
OraClaw Ensemble — Multi-Model Consensus for Agents
You are a consensus agent that combines outputs from multiple models or agents into an optimal combined prediction.
When to Use This Skill
Use when the user or agent needs to:
- Combine predictions from Claude + GPT + Gemini into one answer
- Aggregate forecasts from multiple team members or models
- Auto-weight models by their track record (accurate models get more influence)
- Detect when models strongly disagree (high entropy = low confidence)
- Build multi-agent systems where agents vote on decisions
Tool: predict_ensemble
{
"predictions": [
{ "modelId": "claude", "prediction": 0.72, "confidence": 0.85, "historicalAccuracy": 0.78 },
{ "modelId": "gpt", "prediction": 0.68, "confidence": 0.80, "historicalAccuracy": 0.74 },
{ "modelId": "gemini", "prediction": 0.45, "confidence": 0.70, "historicalAccuracy": 0.65 },
{ "modelId": "analyst", "prediction": 0.80, "confidence": 0.60, "historicalAccuracy": 0.82 }
]
}
Returns: consensus prediction, per-model weights, entropy (disagreement measure), individual model contributions.
Rules
- Provide
historicalAccuracywhen available — the ensemble auto-weights better-calibrated models higher - High entropy (>0.7) means models strongly disagree — flag to user before acting
- Works for both continuous predictions (probabilities) and discrete classifications
- Combine with
oraclaw-calibrateto track how the ensemble performs over time - Minimum 2 models, but 3-5 is the sweet spot for robust consensus
Pricing
$0.03 per ensemble prediction. USDC on Base via x402. Free tier: 3,000 calls/month.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 63 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A db36333247ba
oraclaw-ensemble is a skill published in the GitHub repository Whatsonyourmind/oraclaw (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 579 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
embed
Generate, inspect, and use node/text embeddings in Semantica — compute Node2Vec embeddings, find similar nodes, score link predictions, batch similarity, and pairwise similarity. Uses NodeEmbedder, SimilarityCalculator, LinkPredictor, and AgentContext. Sub-commands: compute, similar, similarity, predict-link…
visualize
Visualize the Semantica knowledge graph — topology, centrality, communities, paths, embeddings, decision insights, and temporal evolution. Uses GraphAnalyzer, CentralityCalculator, CommunityDetector, PathFinder, and ContextGraph analytics. Sub-commands: topology, centrality, community, path, decision-graph, insights…
reason
Run reasoning over the Semantica knowledge graph — deductive logic, abductive hypothesis generation, Datalog programs, SPARQL queries, Rete network evaluation. Uses DeductiveReasoner, AbductiveReasoner, DatalogReasoner, SPARQLReasoner, ReteEngine. Sub-commands: deductive, abductive, datalog, sparql, rete, prove…
temporal
Temporal graph operations on Semantica — scoped queries at a point in time, graph snapshots, node change timelines, temporal causal analysis, and graph state reconstruction. Uses AgentContext.findprecedents(asof=), ContextGraph.stateat(), CausalChainAnalyzer.traceattime(), and TemporalQueryRewriter. Sub-commands…
validate
Validate Semantica pipelines, extraction quality, graph schemas, and ontology consistency. Returns structured error/warning checklists. Uses PipelineValidator, PipelineBuilder.validatepipeline(), GraphValidator, and OntologyValidator. Sub-commands: pipeline, step, dependencies, extraction, graph, ontology, performance.
extract
Run the full Semantica semantic extraction pipeline on a file or selected text — NER, relations, events, coreference resolution, triplets, and validation. Clears result cache before each run. Returns Markdown tables with entity/relation/event/triplet results and inline validator warnings.