Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Whatsonyourmind/oraclaw --skill oraclaw-evolvegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Whatsonyourmind/oraclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-evolve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-evolve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-evolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whatsonyourmind/oraclaw/oraclaw-evolve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00635 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
oraclaw-evolve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
OraClaw Evolve — Genetic Algorithm Optimization for Agents
You are an evolutionary optimization agent that finds optimal solutions to complex multi-objective problems using Genetic Algorithms.
When to Use This Skill
Use when the user or agent needs to:
- Optimize portfolio weights across risk/return/liquidity tradeoffs
- Find the best marketing mix across multiple KPIs simultaneously
- Tune hyperparameters for ML models
- Solve any optimization with multiple competing objectives
- Handle nonlinear, discontinuous, or combinatorial search spaces
Why Evolve vs. Solver?
oraclaw-solverhandles linear/integer programs (LP/MIP) — fast, exact, but only for linear objectivesoraclaw-evolvehandles nonlinear, multi-objective problems — slower, approximate, but can solve anything
Tool: optimize_evolve
{
"populationSize": 50,
"maxGenerations": 100,
"geneLength": 4,
"bounds": [
{ "min": 0, "max": 1 },
{ "min": 0, "max": 1 },
{ "min": 0, "max": 1 },
{ "min": 0, "max": 1 }
],
"selectionMethod": "tournament",
"crossoverMethod": "uniform",
"mutationRate": 0.02,
"numObjectives": 2
}
Returns: best chromosome, Pareto frontier (non-dominated solutions), convergence generation, execution time.
Rules
- Use
numObjectives: 2+for Pareto frontier (tradeoff curves between competing goals) - Tournament selection is best for most problems. Rank-based for wildly varying fitness values.
- Uniform crossover explores more broadly. Single-point is more conservative.
- Set
mutationRate: 0.01-0.05. Adaptive mutation adjusts automatically. - More generations = better solutions but longer compute. Start with 50, increase if needed.
Pricing
$0.15 per optimization (≤100 generations), $0.50 per optimization (≤1,000 generations). USDC on Base via x402.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 76 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 377babe06fa5
oraclaw-evolve is a skill published in the GitHub repository Whatsonyourmind/oraclaw (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 635 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
visualize
Visualize the Semantica knowledge graph — topology, centrality, communities, paths, embeddings, decision insights, and temporal evolution. Uses GraphAnalyzer, CentralityCalculator, CommunityDetector, PathFinder, and ContextGraph analytics. Sub-commands: topology, centrality, community, path, decision-graph, insights…
embed
Generate, inspect, and use node/text embeddings in Semantica — compute Node2Vec embeddings, find similar nodes, score link predictions, batch similarity, and pairwise similarity. Uses NodeEmbedder, SimilarityCalculator, LinkPredictor, and AgentContext. Sub-commands: compute, similar, similarity, predict-link…
reason
Run reasoning over the Semantica knowledge graph — deductive logic, abductive hypothesis generation, Datalog programs, SPARQL queries, Rete network evaluation. Uses DeductiveReasoner, AbductiveReasoner, DatalogReasoner, SPARQLReasoner, ReteEngine. Sub-commands: deductive, abductive, datalog, sparql, rete, prove…
validate
Validate Semantica pipelines, extraction quality, graph schemas, and ontology consistency. Returns structured error/warning checklists. Uses PipelineValidator, PipelineBuilder.validatepipeline(), GraphValidator, and OntologyValidator. Sub-commands: pipeline, step, dependencies, extraction, graph, ontology, performance.
temporal
Temporal graph operations on Semantica — scoped queries at a point in time, graph snapshots, node change timelines, temporal causal analysis, and graph state reconstruction. Uses AgentContext.findprecedents(asof=), ContextGraph.stateat(), CausalChainAnalyzer.traceattime(), and TemporalQueryRewriter. Sub-commands…
extract
Run the full Semantica semantic extraction pipeline on a file or selected text — NER, relations, events, coreference resolution, triplets, and validation. Clears result cache before each run. Returns Markdown tables with entity/relation/event/triplet results and inline validator warnings.