Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/main/.claude/skills/whistlegraph-pop/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/whistlegraph-pop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/whistlegraph-pop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/whistlegraph-pop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/whistlegraph-pop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer/whistlegraph-pop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
whistlegraph-pop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
whistlegraph → /pop
Turns a whistled TikTok into a musical readout you can compose a /pop
track from. Tooling lives in toolchain/whistlegraph/ (see its README).
Steps
-
Grab + analyze. From a tiktok URL (or
--latest Nfrom the @whistlegraph account):node toolchain/whistlegraph/grab.mjs <tiktok-url>This downloads the mp4, extracts a mono WAV, and runs
analyze.py(pop.venvlibrosa) → tempo, key/scale, whistled-melody note sequence, onsets →downloads/<id>.analysis.json+INDEX.json. -
Read the melody musically. The pyin track quantizes a portamento whistle, so expect neighbor-note jitter (the
centsOffcolumn shows the glides) — read the skeleton, not every blip. Identify the hook, its repeats (titles like "… x2" mean the phrase repeats), the longest held notes (structural anchors), and the cadence. -
Hand off to /pop. Use
key,tempoBPM, andmelody[]to compose bottom-up from AC instruments — never Suno end-to-end (seepop/SCORE.md,pop/lib/). The whistled line is the lead/topline.
Notes
*.mp4/*.wavare gitignored (reproducible from URL);*.analysis.jsonandINDEX.jsonare tracked.node toolchain/whistlegraph/grab.mjs --listsummarizes the corpus.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A bc87e04316b6
whistlegraph-pop is a skill published in the GitHub repository whistlegraph/aesthetic-computer (91 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed ISC. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 474 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
whistlegraph-pop compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| whistlegraph-popwhistlegraph/aesthetic-computer | Skill | 91 | yesterday | ISC | A | 85 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | yesterday | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 315k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |