Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to whitelonng/dshcode. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whitelonng/dshcode/master/.agents/skills/dsh-find-simplifications/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whitelonng/dshcodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/whitelonng/dshcode/dsh-find-simplifications)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whitelonng/dshcode/dsh-find-simplifications"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whitelonng/dshcode/dsh-find-simplifications/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/whitelonng/dshcode/dsh-find-simplifications"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/whitelonng/dshcode/dsh-find-simplifications.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.03185 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00637 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00318 |
Grade A, and why
dsh-find-simplifications scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to dsh-find-simplifications — 160 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finding DeepSeek Harness Simplifications
This skill helps turn a broad "find things to simplify" request into evidence-backed Agent Notes that remove or collapse existing harness surface area. It is guidance, not a checklist: follow the code, keep judgment active, and prefer a few well-proven candidates over a pile of thin guesses.
Start With Repo Context
- Read
AGENTS.md, especially the pre-release stance and the conventions (including the tests-are-not-golden-truth and Agent Notes-are-not-golden-truth doctrines), plus docs/defensive-patterns.md and docs/testing.md. - Skim docs/architecture.md before judging anything under
packages/; simplifications that fight the service map or event taxonomy need extra evidence. - Use the Agent Note tree and its rules to understand intentional architecture. The most relevant implemented examples are drop mutable session summary, shared persistence write coordinator, JSONL-only first-party Session persistence, capability seams, and the twin-adapter Agent Notes.
- Treat dual LLM adapters as intentional by default. Session persistence is different: JSONL is the sole first-party provider, while the backend-neutral service remains available to out-of-tree providers. Do not propose deleting an LLM twin or the persistence seam as "low effort" unless the user explicitly overrides that constraint. Removing an unused method or hook inside a protected seam can still be valid if it does not collapse the protected design.
What Counts As A Strong Candidate
A strong simplification removes, folds, or demotes something real and has clear evidence that the current design costs more than it buys:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines · +8 tokens per session edcbe3e32198
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A c6f0165f6aa3
dsh-find-simplifications is a skill published in the GitHub repository whitelonng/dshcode (704 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 3,185 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to dsh-find-simplifications, differing in 160 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
visionary-cli
Analyze images with DeepSeek's vision model via the visionary-server CLI. Use this whenever the user provides an image, photo, screenshot, or document with images - run vision to look at it rather than guessing.
open-code-review
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the ocr CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply…
open-code-review-delegate
Delegation mode for open-code-review (OCR). Instead of OCR calling an LLM endpoint, this skill instructs the host agent to perform the code review itself, using OCR only for deterministic engineering: file selection and rule resolution. Use when the host agent should drive the review with its own LLM capabilities.
review
Comprehensive security and correctness audit. Use for review, deep review, thermo nuclear, or thermonuclear requests and branch or PR diff audits.
review
Review a small code change for correctness and missing tests.
code-review
Paranoid architect review of code changes for bugs, security, missing tests, and undocumented assumptions. Works on local git diffs OR a GitHub pull request (e.g. owner/repo N). For PRs, can post findings as line-level review comments.