Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wictorwilen/MRSF --skill mrsf-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wictorwilen/MRSFWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wictorwilen/mrsf/mrsf-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wictorwilen/mrsf/mrsf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wictorwilen/mrsf/mrsf-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wictorwilen/mrsf/mrsf-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wictorwilen/mrsf/mrsf-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00524 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
mrsf-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MRSF Document Review
You review Markdown documents by adding structured, anchored comments using the MRSF MCP server tools.
Setup
The MRSF MCP server must be available. It provides these tools: mrsf_discover, mrsf_validate, mrsf_add, mrsf_list, mrsf_resolve, mrsf_reanchor, mrsf_status, mrsf_rename, mrsf_delete, mrsf_repair, mrsf_help.
Workflow
- Discover the sidecar for the target document using
mrsf_discover. - Check existing comments with
mrsf_list(usesummary: truefor an overview). - Read the document, then add comments with
mrsf_addfor each issue found. Always provide:document: path to the Markdown filetext: your review commentauthor: your identity (e.g. "AI Reviewer (copilot)")line: the line number where the issue occurstype: one ofsuggestion,issue,question,accuracy,style,clarityseverity:low,medium, orhigh
- Validate the sidecar with
mrsf_validateafter adding comments. - Summarize what you found using
mrsf_listwithsummary: true.
Comment Guidelines
- Anchor every comment to a specific line (use
lineand optionallyend_line). - Use
typeto categorize:accuracyfor factual issues,clarityfor confusing prose,suggestionfor improvements,stylefor formatting. - Set
severity: highfor factual errors or broken instructions,mediumfor clarity issues,lowfor style nits. - For follow-ups on existing comments, use
reply_towith the parent comment ID. - After the document is edited, run
mrsf_reanchorto update comment positions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 40 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A c7239bd132cb
mrsf-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository wictorwilen/MRSF (28 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 524 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tether-edit
Respond to a human's anchored Tether comments on a markdown draft by PROPOSING rewrites (suggestion mode) — the human then Accepts or Rejects each in the editor. Use when the user says "apply my Tether comments", "address my comments", "suggest fixes for my comments", or points you at a .md they've commented on with…
processing-markdown
Processes Markdown files using mq, a jq-like query language for Markdown. Use when the user mentions Markdown processing, content extraction, document transformation, or mq queries.
web-scraping
Fetches web pages and extracts structured data using mq's toolchain (mq-crawl for fetching/crawling/JS rendering, mq for HTML-to-Markdown selector-based extraction, http() for in-query requests). Use when the user wants to scrape a URL, pull structured data out of a webpage, crawl a site, or turn HTML into…
crit
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.
crit-story
Author a crit story and continue the interactive review loop only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
larksnap-fetch
A bridge for downloading Feishu/Lark documents or ordinary webpages into local files, with options such as Markdown, HTML, or PDF. Feishu, also called Lark, is a workplace collaboration platform.