Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add willwebster5/agent-skills --skill source-threat-modelinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/willwebster5/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/willwebster5/agent-skills/source-threat-modeling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/willwebster5/agent-skills/source-threat-modeling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/willwebster5/agent-skills/source-threat-modeling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.02679 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01340 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00536 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00268 |
Grade A, and why
source-threat-modeling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Source Threat Modeling
Turn a data source into detection coverage. This skill reasons about what threats are relevant to a source type, validates which are detectable in your actual log data, and produces a prioritized detection backlog. It does NOT write detections — it hands off to authoring skills (behavioral-detections, cql-patterns, logscale-security-queries) via handoff documents.
Orchestrator, not author. This skill decides what to detect. Existing skills decide how to write it.
When to Use This Skill
- A new data source is connected to NGSIEM and has no OOTB detection templates
- You want to assess detection coverage gaps for an existing source
- You need a structured threat model before building bespoke detections
- You're onboarding a source type you haven't worked with before
Handoff Input
This skill can be invoked directly or via a handoff document. If a handoff doc is provided, read it first and skip questions already answered.
Phase 1: Source Identification
Goal: Establish what source we're working with and how to query it.
Ask the user:
- What product/vendor is the data source? (e.g., Okta, GitHub audit logs, Cisco ASA, Zscaler)
- What log types are being ingested? (authentication, admin activity, network flow, API audit, etc.)
- What is the NGSIEM scope filter?
- e.g.,
#Vendor="okta",#repo="some_repo",#event.module="some_module" - If the user doesn't know, help discover it:
* | groupBy([@repo, #Vendor, #event.module], limit=20)
- e.g.,
- What role does this source play in the environment? (identity provider, network perimeter, cloud infrastructure, application-level, endpoint, email/collaboration)
Check for existing coverage:
- Scan
resources/detections/for any rules already targeting this source - Note what's covered so we don't duplicate
Output: A CQL scope filter and source profile that constrains all subsequent work.
STOP — Confirm the scope filter and source profile with the user before proceeding to threat modeling.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 321 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 55971ccbf129
source-threat-modeling is a skill published in the GitHub repository willwebster5/agent-skills (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 2,679 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…