Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI/main/.claude/skills/closing-session/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/closing-session)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/closing-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/closing-session/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/closing-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/closing-session.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.35576 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00059 | $0.14230 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.07115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.03558 |
Grade A, and why
closing-session scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 2,081 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Load Gate
This skill is for closing work, not building it. If the task is "implement
X and open a PR", you are a build session — load build-session instead.
If the task is "take the open PRs and get them merged", you are here.
The two are different SESSION TYPES, not two phases of one session's life.
There is no "repair" session type (owner, 2026-10-19/20). Fixing review
findings on an open PR is closing work, whoever built it: closing stays one
role, and the merge gate is the judge (owner ruling, 2026-09-03). A PR sent back
with a decision-complete ## Rework spec (step 5) goes to a build session as
rework (build-session, "Building a rework"), never back into this loop.
Rescuing a broken architecture (a BROKEN premise, a needs-architecture-session
PR) is owner-attended: a dispatched session hands it off as "Some PRs are not a
review problem" (below) describes, and never attempts the rescue itself.
Load genesis-development (the shared core) first if this session has not:
it holds the review-chain, evidence and private-data rules every session uses.
Mandatory read before your first commit:
.claude/skills/genesis-development/references/commit-path.md. A closing
session commits review fixes, and the commit gates bind it the same way.
Fixing a finding also uses rules that live in
.claude/skills/build-session/SKILL.md: "Instance-Fix vs Class-Fix Gate",
"Debugging Discipline", "Test-First Discipline, continued", "Verify Outcomes,
Not Just Tests", "Advisory is the default; a BLOCK is what needs the
argument", "Guard failure semantics", "Common Traps" (the canonical-parser
mandate and the guard corollaries), "CI checks" and "A blocked compound command
loses EVERYTHING in it". Read the one a finding touches.
Why this session type exists
Building a PR and driving it to merge are different jobs. Fused, the first item's review loop eats the session — several compactions deep — while everything else the owner arrived with goes untouched. Splitting them makes the review loop somebody's whole job instead of everybody's tax.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -414 lines ba1137c7fadb
- 3d ago Changed · +1,600 lines · -1 tokens per session b8ea675a6387
- 4d ago Changed · +50 lines · +17 tokens per session b5fa52b065a6
- 11d ago Changed · +2 lines e947da2f1f85
- 13d ago Changed · +9 lines 5a1e32fad5a9
- 18d ago Changed · +155 lines f5d4eca0d675
- 19d ago Changed · +203 lines a548b43c7562
- 22d ago Changed · +3 lines 825614ea0248
- 23d ago Changed · +2 lines 352c05f30204
- 24d ago First seen · 471 lines · 131 tokens per session scan A b18d4b96d8c0
closing-session is a skill published in the GitHub repository WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI (99 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 35,576 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-workflow
Conventional commits, PR creation, and quality gate verification.
address-github-comments
Use when you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI.
github-code-review
Review code changes by analyzing git diffs, leaving inline comments on PRs, and performing thorough pre-push review. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
agent-swarm-pr
Agent skill for swarm-pr - invoke with $agent-swarm-pr.
agent-pr-manager
Agent skill for pr-manager - invoke with $agent-pr-manager.