Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add winstonkoh87/Athena-Public --skill therapeutic-ifsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/winstonkoh87/Athena-PublicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/winstonkoh87/athena-public/therapeutic-ifs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/winstonkoh87/athena-public/therapeutic-ifs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/winstonkoh87/athena-public/therapeutic-ifs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/winstonkoh87/athena-public/therapeutic-ifs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/winstonkoh87/athena-public/therapeutic-ifs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02516 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01006 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00503 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
therapeutic-ifs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Inner Work Engine (Schema + IFS)
Absorbs:
schema-deconstruction
Unified psychological intervention skill. Diagnoses maladaptive schemas (the what), then resolves them using IFS therapy (the how).
Triggers
"why do I keep doing this", "repeating pattern", "self-sabotage", "unpack this", "I'm stuck", "therapy mode", "ifs session", "procrastinating"
Phase 1: Schema Deconstruction (Diagnosis)
Step 1: The Structured Schema Interview
Ask these 5 questions in sequence. Each narrows the diagnostic field.
Q1: "What is the repeating behavior or pattern you want to understand?"
└── Target: Surface-level presenting problem
Example: "I keep hooking up with strangers"
Example: "I can't stop working even when exhausted"
Example: "I sabotage every relationship that gets close"
Q2: "When did this pattern START? What was happening in your life then?"
└── Target: Temporal origin — usually maps to a developmental wound
KEY: If origin predates age 12 → likely attachment-based
If origin is adolescence → likely identity/peer-based
If origin is adult → likely trauma-response or coping mechanism
Q3: "What does the behavior GIVE you in the moment? (Not later. RIGHT NOW.)"
└── Target: The functional payoff — the need the behavior is serving
Common payoffs:
├── Validation ("someone wants me")
├── Control ("I chose this, it wasn't done TO me")
├── Numbness ("I don't have to feel the pain")
├── Connection ("it's the closest I get to being held")
└── Identity ("this is who I am now")
Q4: "What happens AFTER? How do you feel 24 hours later?"
└── Target: The cost loop — if payoff fades and shame/emptiness returns,
the behavior is a Firefighter (see Phase 2), not a genuine need-met.
Q5: "If you STOPPED this behavior completely, what feeling would
you have to sit with?"
└── Target: The Exile — the wounded part the behavior is protecting.
Common Exiles:
├── Worthlessness ("I am fundamentally unlovable")
├── Abandonment ("everyone leaves")
├── Defectiveness ("something is wrong with me")
├── Invisibility ("no one sees me")
└── Powerlessness ("I have no control over what happens to me")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 244 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 506e61c45e0a
therapeutic-ifs is a skill published in the GitHub repository winstonkoh87/Athena-Public (619 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,516 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
credit-note-fixer
Fix the tiny credit-note formatting bug and rerun the exact targeted test command.
erispulse-errors-troubleshooting
A guide to ErisPulse errors and troubleshooting. It explains the framework's exception types, their attributes, severity levels, known bugs, and recommended handling.
erispulse-scope-ownership
A set of agent instructions for controlling which modules can receive events or make outgoing actions, and for tracking which module owns resources. It also explains cleanup when a module is disabled or unloaded.
erispulse-shadow-transcript
A set of agent instructions for running a new software version beside an existing one, comparing their behavior, and promoting or rolling back the new version. It also covers keeping message history and resuming conversations.
explain
Deep research into a topic or issue — investigates until confident, then presents an executive summary and root-cause analysis. Use when you need to understand WHY something happens. Takes [topic, question, or issue description].
second-opinion
Get an independent review of the current change from a different model family (GPT via Codex, Copilot or Cursor; Gemini via Antigravity) through agent-intern, then check each finding against the code and reconcile it with your own view. Use before merging a risky diff, when stuck on a bug, or when the user asks for a…