Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wiolett-industries/marketplace --skill review-merge-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiolett-industries/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wiolett-industries/marketplace/review-merge-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wiolett-industries/marketplace/review-merge-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wiolett-industries/marketplace/review-merge-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wiolett-industries/marketplace/review-merge-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wiolett-industries/marketplace/review-merge-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01295 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
review-merge-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Merge Request
Run one discussion-aware GitLab review path. This skill is mutually exclusive with Workflow finalizing-plan for the same review. This plugin MCP owns only .workflow/mr-reviews/ protocol state and artifacts; use any separately configured and authorized GitLab interface available in the environment, such as an external GitLab MCP or authenticated glab, for GitLab reads and writes.
.workflow/mr-reviews/ is the default artifact root. If mr_review_status
reports a configured root, use that MCP-reported location rather than assuming
the default filesystem path.
Every pass ends in blocked, findings, or clean. approved is the post-clean state after the final note and approval occur together.
Intake And Mode
- Load current MR metadata, SHA, diff, CI/check state, and every current discussion before code review. Preserve unresolved, resolved, and stale context; if a resolved issue regresses, create a new linked thread.
- Extract the linked task when present. Warn and continue when absent. Treat unrelated cleanup, drive-by refactors, and extra features as out of scope unless explicitly justified.
- Choose mode:
normal: ordinary bounded MR.high-risk: auth/session/identity/wallet/account/permission, billing, destructive data/migrations, infra/deploy, security-sensitive behavior, public/shared contracts, concurrency/state invalidation, broad refactor, or uncertain blast radius.
- Open or resume one review run at the current SHA with the MR review MCP.
Draft/WIP MRs are not reviewable. Red MR/CI checks or reproducible failing required repo checks produce blocked. Local tooling uncertainty is reported in chat, not as a blocked GitLab note.
Evidence Scope
Review the actual diff and trace affected execution paths. Read a full changed file when the diff lacks control-flow, state, contract, or integration context; do not read every generated, lock, snapshot, vendor, binary, or trivial file by ritual. Inspect those only when risky, suspicious, or unexpectedly large.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 75 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 6368c9270d9c
review-merge-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository wiolett-industries/marketplace (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,295 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…
oss-maintainer
Run an open-source project's issue/PR/release loop like a careful human maintainer — triage to root cause, absorb community PRs before duplicating them, gate every merge, ship honest releases, and thank the people doing your QA for free.