PRP is a collection of prompts and workflows for AI-assisted software development with Claude Code. Its Product Requirement Prompts combine product requirements, selected codebase context, and an execution runbook so a coding agent can implement a vertical slice of software. The catalogue entries are the project’s own skills, agents, instructions, hook, and plugin workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Wirasm/prp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Wirasm/prp/development/.agents/skills/prp-deliver/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wirasm/prpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wirasm/prp/prp-deliver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wirasm/prp/prp-deliver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wirasm/prp/prp-deliver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wirasm/prp/prp-deliver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wirasm/prp/prp-deliver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
prp-deliver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Arguments:
$ARGUMENTS(and$1,$2, ...) refer to the arguments given when this skill was invoked. Take them from the user's request; if absent, infer them from the conversation.
Deliver to a Reviewed PR
Own one outcome from source input to a published READY TO MERGE review and green CI. Act as the sub-orchestrator for this delivery: start and steer specialist agents, preserve their handoff artifacts, and do not implement or review the work in this context.
Input: $ARGUMENTS (if absent, use the conversation).
Ownership contract
- Continue autonomously through plan, implementation, PR, review, correction, re-review, and CI. A published report is observable progress, not a pause point.
- Run stages sequentially in the delivery owner's checkout. Only one implementation or correction agent may mutate it at a time.
- Use a fresh agent for planning, a fresh agent for implementation, and a fresh independent agent for every review. Resume the implementation agent for corrections while it remains available.
- Keep the plan path, implementation report, PR, latest review report, publication URL, and agent handles. Durable artifacts—not recalled summaries—cross context windows.
- Keep a verbatim caller-decisions record of two kinds: constraints that bind the whole delivery, such as scope, base, and product decisions; and dispositions attached to one finding or blocker. A constraint applies to every later stage. A disposition applies only to the finding it names, while that finding is live. Update the record when the caller resolves a blocker, and pass each fresh agent the constraints plus the dispositions its stage acts on, verbatim.
- Carry the burden of proof. Prove completion with green validation, the live PR, the complete published review, its
READY TO MERGEverdict, and green required CI. - Stop only when a product decision, missing prerequisite primitive, inaccessible dependency, permission boundary, or repeated no-progress failure cannot be resolved autonomously. Report the exact decision or access needed and a recommendation.
- Do not merge the PR. The caller owns the merge gate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a84bdf926c84
prp-deliver is a skill published in the GitHub repository Wirasm/prp (2,266 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,428 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…