Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit/vc-debugnpx skills add withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit --skill vc-debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00617 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
vc-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ck:debug — 86% identical, 26 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging & System Investigation
Output style: Follow
process/development-protocols/communication-standards.md— answer-first, plain language, no unexplained jargon, TL;DR on long responses.
Comprehensive framework combining systematic debugging, root cause tracing, defense-in-depth validation, verification protocols, and system-level investigation (logs, CI/CD, databases, performance).
Core Principle
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Find root cause, fix at source, validate at every layer, verify before claiming success.
When to Use
Code-level: Test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, build failures, integration problems System-level: Server errors, CI/CD pipeline failures, performance degradation, database issues, log analysis Always: Before claiming work complete
Techniques
1. Systematic Debugging (references/systematic-debugging.md)
Four-phase framework: Root Cause Investigation → Pattern Analysis → Hypothesis Testing → Implementation. Complete each phase before proceeding. No fixes without Phase 1.
Load when: Any bug/issue requiring investigation and fix
2. Root Cause Tracing (references/root-cause-tracing.md)
Trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger. Fix at source, not symptom. Includes scripts/find-polluter.sh for bisecting test pollution.
Load when: Error deep in call stack, unclear where invalid data originated
3. Defense-in-Depth (references/defense-in-depth.md)
Validate at every layer: Entry validation → Business logic → Environment guards → Debug instrumentation
Load when: After finding root cause, need comprehensive validation
4. Verification (references/verification.md)
Iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE. Run command. Read output. Then claim result.
Load when: About to claim work complete, fixed, or passing
5. Investigation Methodology (references/investigation-methodology.md)
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/defense-in-depth.md 3.6 KB
- references/frontend-verification.md 3.6 KB
- references/investigation-methodology.md 4.0 KB
- references/log-and-ci-analysis.md 3.4 KB
- references/performance-diagnostics.md 3.8 KB
- references/reporting-standards.md 2.9 KB
- references/root-cause-tracing.md 3.3 KB
- references/systematic-debugging.md 4.1 KB
- references/task-management-debugging.md 5.6 KB
- references/verification.md 3.3 KB
- scripts/find-polluter.sh 1.5 KB runs code
- scripts/find-polluter.test.md 2.1 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 128 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A acb05feab1a8
vc-debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository withkynam/vibecode-pro-max-kit (1,112 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,234 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from backlog to merged PR. Handles git branching, schema-driven planning, implementation, independent review, and PR creation. Composes spec-quality, review-quality, and schema-workflow skills into a single pipeline. Use when a user says "implement this", "work on this…
session-retrospective
Analyzes the current implementation run — evaluates schema effectiveness, delegation alignment, note quality, and plan-to-execution fit. Captures cross-session trends and proposes improvements when patterns repeat. Use after implementation runs, or when user says 'retrospective', 'session review', 'what did we learn'…
ralph
Launcher for the Ralph-style queue drain script — emits the right node ralph-loop.mjs invocation based on the user's filter and bounds. The actual loop runs as a Node script that spawns one claude -p --worktree per iteration; this skill is the configurator, not the loop. Use when a user says: drain the backlog, ralph…
quick-start
Interactive onboarding for the MCP Task Orchestrator. Detects empty or populated workspaces and walks through how plan mode, persistent tracking, and the MCP work together. Use when a user says "get started", "how do I use this", "quick start", "first time setup", "onboard me", "what can this MCP do", or "help me…
review-proposals
Triages pending improvement-proposal MCP items — presents each with its scope and evidence, collects an accept/reject/defer decision per proposal, and carries out the disposition: project-scoped acceptances get their exact YAML applied to .taskorchestrator/config.yaml and pushed per-root; global acceptances get a…
work-summary
Generates a project dashboard from MCP work items. Default is a lean, attention-first view: what's in flight, what's blocked, what to do next, what's queued. Use when the user says: project status, what's active, show me the dashboard, work summary, what should I work on, project health, what's blocked, where did I…