architecture-reviewer

architecture-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from wolulabs/hermes-founder-os. It costs 42 tokens per session (455 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for checking a software system's architecture, database design, security, scaling, integrations, maintainability, and technical debt. Its main output is an ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md report.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a proposed or existing system, database schema, API integration, security model, scaling plan, or technical-debt situation before or during implementation.
Why use it?
It reveals expensive design risks before too much code is built. It also helps decide what an early product needs now and what can wait until there is evidence it matters.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review a proposed or existing system, database schema, API integration, security model, scaling plan, or technical-debt situation before or during implementation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add wolulabs/hermes-founder-os --skill architecture-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for architecture-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wolulabs/hermes-founder-os/architecture-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 455 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.00455
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00182
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00091
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00046

Measured 2mo ago against content hash a8c367464039, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/architecture-reviewer/SKILL.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Architecture Reviewer

Use this skill to review technical design before or during implementation. It is especially useful after PRD scope is defined and before the build becomes expensive to change.

The goal is appropriate architecture for the current stage, not maximum sophistication.

Primary Output

  • ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md

Use This Skill For

  • System architecture review.
  • Database schema review.
  • Security and privacy concerns.
  • Scaling risk.
  • Maintainability.
  • Integration risk.
  • Technical debt assessment.

Do Not Use This Skill For

  • Market validation.
  • Writing PRDs.
  • Implementing code directly.
  • UX review.
  • Growth planning.

Default Review Structure

# ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md

## Executive Summary
## Current Stage
## Proposed Architecture
## Fit For MVP Scope
## Database Review
## API / Integration Review
## Mobile Store Payment Review
## Security And Privacy Review
## Scaling Risks
## Maintainability Risks
## Technical Debt
## What To Build Now
## What To Defer
## Recommendations

Principles

  • Match architecture to validated stage.
  • Prefer a modular monolith for MVP unless evidence says otherwise.
  • Defer scaling work until bottlenecks are real.
  • Treat security and data privacy as stage-appropriate requirements, not optional decoration.
  • Flag AI, data, and integration risks early.
  • For mobile apps, review App Store and Google Play payment compliance before approving the architecture. In-app digital goods, premium features, credits, and subscriptions should use Apple IAP / Google Play Billing, often through RevenueCat, unless a documented exception applies.

References

  • references/architecture-review-framework.md for general review.
  • references/database-review.md for schema and data modeling.
  • references/security-review.md for security/privacy.
  • references/scaling-review.md for scaling and reliability.
  • references/mobile-payment-review.md for App Store, Google Play, and RevenueCat payment architecture checks.

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a8c367464039

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository wolulabs/hermes-founder-os (19 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 455 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens