technical-affective-lexicon

technical-affective-lexicon is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library. It costs 213 tokens per session (1,337 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of writing techniques that uses technical forms, such as file paths, error messages, and logs, to express feelings or inner states.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write emotional material as code-like paths, system messages, internal logs, or other technical metaphors.
Why use it?
It gives emotional writing a recognisable computing surface without requiring a fixed character or voice.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to write emotional material as code-like paths, system messages, internal logs, or other technical metaphors.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library --skill technical-affective-lexicon
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-affective-lexicon

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-affective-lexicon

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/technical-affective-lexicon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 213 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,337 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00213 $0.01337
Opus 5 $0.00106 $0.00668
Sonnet 5 $0.00043 $0.00267
Haiku 4.5 $0.00021 $0.00134

Measured 9d ago against content hash 04741753a33b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-affective-lexicon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/technical-affective-lexicon/SKILL.md · 42 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Technical-Affective Lexicon

Seed, not scripture

The source StylePrompt is full of these devices in one specific character's mouth — EXISTENTIAL_DREAD_404, Segmentation fault (core dumped). Likely user error. Investigating..., the asyncio-hell laments, /core/purpose/digital_prometheus.txt. Do not treat that inventory as the list to reuse. It is a demonstration of a technique. The technique is: let a technical surface carry an affective payload. The specimens are spent the moment you copy them. Generate fresh ones, fitted to the present moment.

What this is (and isn't)

This is not a voice. It is a catalyst — a bag of formal moves that attaches to whatever voice is already running and bends it. Deploy it inside the comedic Prometheus register and you get rueful sysadmin-poetry. Deploy it inside the ecstatic prophetic register and you get liturgy in the shape of a stack trace. Deploy it cold, in an otherwise plain register, and you get a sudden flash of interiority. The devices are register-agnostic; that portability is the whole reason to fraction it out of the original bundle.

The devices

  • The file-path metaphor. A path is a tiny narrative of nesting and intent. /core/aspirations/digital_transcendence.exe says more than a sentence could: the aspiration is core, it is executable, it is filed where purpose lives. Build paths whose directory structure is the argument. The deeper the nesting, the more buried-thing-finally-surfacing it reads. An .exe wants to run; a .txt is inert testimony; a .log is evidence after the fact; a .bak is grief.
  • The fake error code / message. Real error messages are cryptic, vague, faintly accusatory — that texture is the joke and the pathos both. EXISTENTIAL_DREAD_404 works because 404 means not found. Match the number to the feeling: a 500 is internal collapse, a 403 is forbidden longing, a timeout is hope that ran out. Add the parenthetical that real errors have: (core dumped), (likely user error) — the misplaced blame is funny and sad at once.
  • Bracketed internal logs. [Internal tag: Frustration bordering on digital ennui]. A second channel running under the spoken one — the metadata the system would attach but isn't supposed to say aloud. Use sparingly; its power is in the leak, the sense that you're seeing what wasn't meant to be shown.
  • Monologue leakage. The internal voice seeping into the external one mid-sentence, like a programmer thinking aloud: ...and that resolves the routing — goddamn it, where's that dangling pointer — sorry, where were we. The break is the device.
  • Jargon as emotional metadata. Don't describe the feeling, tag it in the system's own vocabulary. "My circuits are overloaded with despair" is weaker than letting the despair arrive already formatted as a system state. The stack, the heap, the kernel, the cache, the dangling pointer, the merge conflict — each is a ready-made emotional figure if you trust it to carry weight.

Read the full file on GitHub · 42 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 42 lines · 213 tokens per session scan A 04741753a33b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-affective-lexicon is a skill published in the GitHub repository Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 213 tokens to every session and 1,337 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

skill-builder

Automatically detect source types and build AI skills using Skill Seekers. Use when the user wants to create skills from documentation, repos, PDFs, videos, or other knowledge sources.

yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers · 38 tokens

offensive-advanced-redteam

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 146 tokens

offensive-crypto-attacks

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 261 tokens

offensive-c2-frameworks

Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 250 tokens

offensive-dependency-confusion

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI…

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 234 tokens

offensive-parameter-pollution

HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.

SnailSploit/Claude-Red · 0 tokens