Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add woodfishhhh/EZ_math_model --skill paper-writing-benchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/woodfishhhh/EZ_math_modelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/woodfishhhh/ez_math_model/paper-writing-bench)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woodfishhhh/ez_math_model/paper-writing-bench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woodfishhhh/ez_math_model/paper-writing-bench/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woodfishhhh/ez_math_model/paper-writing-bench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woodfishhhh/ez_math_model/paper-writing-bench.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01306 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00653 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
paper-writing-bench scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to paper-writing-bench — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PaperWritingBench (§3)
Faithful implementation of the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, §3 and App. C, F.2).
The original benchmark contains 200 papers (100 CVPR 2025 + 100 ICLR 2025). For each paper, the authors reverse-engineer the (I, E) tuple by stripping narrative flow from the original PDF using the three prompts in App. F.2. You can use this skill to reverse-engineer your own benchmark cases from any paper PDF.
What this skill does
Given an existing AI research paper (PDF or markdown extract), produce:
idea.md(Sparse variant) — high-level concept note, no math, no experimental resultsidea.md(Dense variant) — detailed technical proposal with LaTeX equations and variable definitions, but still no experimental resultsexperimental_log.md— exhaustive raw experimental setup, numeric data, and qualitative observations, with all narrative references stripped
These three files form a complete (I, E) input pair for the
paper-orchestra pipeline. You can then run the pipeline and compare its
output to the original paper using paper-autoraters.
Inputs
- A paper PDF or extracted markdown text. The paper uses MinerU (Wang et al., 2024) for PDF→markdown extraction; you (the host agent) should use whatever PDF extractor your environment provides.
- For controlled experiments, you may also extract figures separately (PDFFigures 2.0 in the paper).
Outputs
bench/<paper_id>/idea_sparse.md— Sparse variantbench/<paper_id>/idea_dense.md— Dense variantbench/<paper_id>/experimental_log.md— Experimental log
Workflow
For each paper, run three independent LLM calls using the verbatim prompts below:
1. Sparse idea generation
Load references/sparse-idea-prompt.md. Pass the paper text (or
markdown extract) as {paper_content}. The prompt instructs the model to:
- Stop extracting at empirical verification (no Experiments / Results / Comparisons)
- Use first-person future tense ("We propose to explore...")
- Avoid LaTeX math; describe components by function
- Anonymize authors and titles
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 134 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A c4f90aaae0ba
paper-writing-bench is a skill published in the GitHub repository woodfishhhh/EZ_math_model (41 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,306 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to paper-writing-bench, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
math-modeling-solver
A Chinese-language guide for solving mathematical modeling competition problems. It covers China’s CUMCM and America’s MCM/ICM, where teams use mathematics and code to answer real-world problem statements.
mathmodel-skill
An end-to-end workflow for mathematical-modeling competitions, including CUMCM, MCM/ICM, and the Electrical Cup. It guides teams from choosing a problem through modeling, solving, checking, writing, rule compliance, and final review.
math-modeling-paper
A Chinese-language guide for writing papers for mathematical modelling competitions, where teams use mathematics and data to study a real-world problem.
modeling-repair-regression
Targeted repair/regression coordinator. After a confirmed defect is fixed by its owner, rerun the smallest affected downstream checks and behavior comparisons.
interpret-modeling-problems
A method for turning a mathematical modelling contest problem and its attachments into a checked plan for solving and documenting it.
verify
Run ICM stage 03 - report the implementation against the plan's Validation checklist.