Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills --skill curatorial-topic-framinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills/curatorial-topic-framing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills/curatorial-topic-framing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills/curatorial-topic-framing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills/curatorial-topic-framing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills/curatorial-topic-framing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00554 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
curatorial-topic-framing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
策展选题与对象界定
概述
使用这个 skill 把模糊兴趣转化为清楚的策展对象。目标不是无限发散选题，而是确认展览真正研究什么、观众从哪里进入、哪些材料进入范围、当前阶段应产出什么。
核心问题
进入页面设计之前，先回答这些问题：
- 策展对象是什么：城市、机构、人物、物件组、档案、事件、路线、社会机制、地方记忆，还是某种材料系统？
- 观众通过什么尺度进入：人物、物件、地点、时段、路径、案例、文档、问题，还是感官经验？
- 进入尺度背后的真正主体是什么？
- 项目最终要让观众看见什么？
- 当前有哪些材料可靠、缺失、存疑或不应进入？
- 当前阶段边界是什么：概念说明、内容大纲、页面原型、标准页、公开发布，还是方法回收？
工作步骤
- 整理用户的兴趣、材料和既有想法，先不预设最终网页形式。
- 提取 2 到 4 个可能的策展对象。
- 分别判断每个对象的进入尺度、真实主体、证据条件、观众和风险。
- 推荐一个主 framing，并说明为什么它更稳。
- 写出短版项目前提和阶段边界。
输出
输出一份简洁的定题说明，包含：项目对象、进入尺度、真实主体、目标观众、材料边界、排除方向、阶段目标和下一步应创建的文档。
常见偏差
需要警惕这些情况：
- 人物成为全部故事，背后的结构消失。
- 材料变成数据库，缺少策展判断。
- 历史图像或视觉复原变成项目成立的理由。
- 主题过宽，每一页都必须重新解释全部背景。
- 在策展对象稳定之前，先决定网页交互和视觉风格。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 44 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 247155b06bd2
curatorial-topic-framing is a skill published in the GitHub repository wuyaojunkylin/research-digital-curation-skills (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 554 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
exhibition-outline
A template for turning an exhibition plan into a three-page presentation outline. The pages cover the theme, its explanation and visitor story, and a detailed area-by-area display plan.
exhibition-theme-brainstorm
A structured brainstorming method for creating exhibition themes, meaning the ideas and story that guide a museum, company, or institutional display. It develops themes from broad ideas, an organisation’s identity, its values, and possible visual expressions.
tender-analysis
A workflow for reviewing tender documents, which are formal project requests that describe requirements and bidding rules. It extracts project details, technical and business conditions, deadlines, scoring rules, risks, and questions for clarification.
interaction-team-deliverables
A design-delivery guide for turning an exhibition plan into instructions that an interaction-design team can implement. It covers interactive exhibits, content-management tools, user experience, visualisation, and switching between multiple visual styles.
tender-booklet-writing
A Chinese-language writing skill for explaining each page of a bid proposal booklet. A bid proposal booklet is a presentation document prepared to respond to a tender or contract request.
ppt-layout
A page-by-page layout guide for turning an exhibition plan into a presentation. It defines each slide’s purpose, text hierarchy, content, visual suggestions, and one-sentence takeaway.