Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code --skill btwgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/btw)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/btw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/btw/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/btw"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/btw.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01853 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00741 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00371 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
btw scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/btw - By-The-Way Suggestion Collector
작업 중 "이거 스킬로 만들면 좋겠다", "이 패턴 자동화하면 좋겠다" 등의 개선 제안을 즉시 기록하고 관리하는 도구.
Commands
/btw {suggestion} - Record a suggestion
- Read
.bkit/btw-suggestions.json(create if not exists) - Generate next ID:
btw-NNN(zero-padded, sequential) - Create suggestion entry:
{ "id": "btw-001", "timestamp": "ISO-8601", "suggestion": "{user input}", "context": { "file": "{current working file if identifiable}", "pdcaPhase": "{current PDCA phase from getPdcaStatusView() or null}", "feature": "{current feature or null}" }, "category": "auto-detect", "status": "pending", "promotedTo": null, "priority": null, "teamContext": { "isTeamSession": false, "phase": "{PDCA phase or null}", "role": "{teammate role that discovered this, or 'user'}", "pattern": "{orchestration pattern or null}" } } - Auto-detect category from suggestion text:
skill-request: mentions "skill", "스킬", "자동화", "automate"bug-pattern: mentions "bug", "버그", "오류", "error", "fix"improvement: mentions "개선", "improve", "better", "refactor"documentation: mentions "문서", "doc", "설명", "explain"general: default
- Update
stats.totalcount - Respond: "Recorded btw-{NNN}: {truncated suggestion}. Use
/btw listto view all."
/btw list - List all suggestions
- Read
.bkit/btw-suggestions.json - Display table:
ID | Status | Category | Suggestion (truncated) ---------|----------|----------------|---------------------- btw-001 | pending | skill-request | @Flow 모델에서 옵션 목록을 자동... btw-002 | promoted | improvement | DataProxy 패턴에 검증 로직을... - Show summary: Total: N | Pending: N | Promoted: N | Dismissed: N
/btw analyze - Analyze suggestions for skill candidates
- Read all pending suggestions from
.bkit/btw-suggestions.json - Group by category and find patterns:
- Cluster similar suggestions (keyword overlap)
- Count frequency of similar topics
- Identify suggestions that map to existing bkit skills vs. new skill needs
- For each skill candidate:
- Estimate skill classification: workflow vs capability
- Suggest skill name and description
- Reference source suggestion IDs
- Output analysis:
Skill Candidates from /btw Analysis ===================================== 1. [NEW SKILL] hunikflow-validation (capability) Based on: btw-001, btw-005, btw-008 Frequency: 3 mentions Description: Validation pattern guide for @Flow entities 2. [EXISTING SKILL ENHANCEMENT] code-review Based on: btw-003 Suggestion: Add DataProxy-specific review rules - Save analysis timestamp to
stats.lastAnalyzed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 5de897119797
- 1mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A b2ebf11b38fc
btw is a skill published in the GitHub repository ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code (604 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,853 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
stream-chain
Stream-JSON chaining for multi-agent pipelines, data transformation, and sequential workflows. Use when piping output between agents/tools as streaming JSON or building a sequential transform pipeline.
rotation-check
Standard-Gerüst für rotierende Pipeline-Checks: Pro Lauf genau ein Ziel aus einer Menge (Projekte, Ordner, Repos) wählen — bevorzugt das am längsten ungeprüfte —, den Check durchführen, Ergebnis in einer Check-Registry und einem Verlaufslog festhalten. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn ein wiederkehrender Check über viele…
evidence-selfloop
Evidence self-loop for surveys: read evidence bindings + evidence packs, then write an actionable upstream TODO plan (which stage/skill to fix) before writing more prose.
citation-verifier
Generate and verify BibTeX entries from paper notes, writing citations/ref.bib and citations/verified.jsonl.
claim-evidence-matrix
Seed outline/claimevidencematrix.md from outline+notes; claim-matrix-rewriter rewrites it later from evidence packs.
tsq-quick
A controller-guided way to complete one coding task while keeping the project’s existing specifications, memory, and workflow state in view.