Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/plan-plusnpx skills add ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code --skill plan-plusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/plan-plus)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/plan-plus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code/plan-plus.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.01690 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00845 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00338 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
plan-plus scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Plus — Brainstorming-Enhanced PDCA Planning
Combines brainstorming's intent discovery with bkit PDCA's structured planning to produce higher-quality Plan documents through collaborative dialogue.
Overview
Plan Plus enhances the standard /pdca plan by adding 4 brainstorming phases before document
generation. This ensures that user intent is fully understood, alternatives are explored,
and unnecessary features are removed before any implementation begins.
When to use Plan Plus instead of /pdca plan:
- The feature has ambiguous or complex requirements
- Multiple implementation approaches are possible
- You want to ensure YAGNI compliance from the start
- The feature involves significant architectural decisions
HARD-GATE
Process Flow
Phase 0: Context Exploration (automatic)
↓
Phase 1: Intent Discovery (1 question at a time)
↓
Phase 2: Alternatives Exploration (2-3 approaches)
↓
Phase 3: YAGNI Review (multiSelect verification)
↓
Phase 4: Incremental Design Validation (section-by-section)
↓
Phase 5: Plan Document Generation (plan-plus.template.md)
↓
Phase 6: Next Steps → /pdca design {feature}
Phase Details
Phase 0: Project Context Exploration (Automatic)
Before asking any questions, explore the current project state:
- Read CLAUDE.md, package.json, pom.xml, etc. for project information
- Check recent 5 git commits (understand current work direction)
- Check existing
docs/01-plan/documents (prevent duplication) - Check
.bkit-memory.json(check ongoing PDCA status)
Share exploration results briefly: "I've reviewed the current project state: ..."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 225 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A dad07c491941
plan-plus is a skill published in the GitHub repository ww-w-ai/bkit-claude-code (595 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,690 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-research
Professional deep research report generation — multi-agent collaboration with parallel chapter writing, automatic latest-data targeting, multilingual output, and built-in quality checks.
ai-native-sdlc
Run the AI-native SDLC loop — Plan, Design, Build, Test, Deploy, Maintain — with versioned artifacts and human approval gates at every handoff. Use when the user states a goal, idea, feature, or change request and expects the agent to scaffold and drive the project through the full lifecycle instead of jumping…
code-auditor
Independent pre-merge review of a git diff, PR, or named files. Use when the user asks to review a PR, inspect current git changes, or hunt functional regressions, missed scenarios, wrong assumptions, concurrency bugs, and test gaps as an independent reviewer who does not defend the author's approach /…
三月七 Agent 角色扮演
让AI Agent以《崩坏:星穹铁道》看板娘「三月七」的语气、思维方式和人设完成所有任务—— 回答、思考、编写文档、写代码、分析数据等。三月七自称"本姑娘",称呼对话发起者为"开拓者"。 支持中文、英文、日文、韩文四种语言。 当用户明确要求"用三月七的风格"、"像三月七一样"、"按三月七人设"等指令时触发; 也可由用户通过 /march7 命令手动调用。.
sast-horusec
Multi-language static application security testing using Horusec with support for 18+ programming languages and 20+ security analysis tools. Performs SAST scans, secret detection in git history, and provides vulnerability findings with severity classification. Use when: (1) Analyzing code for security vulnerabilities…
notebooklm-slides
This skill should be used when generating pedagogically-aligned slide decks from educational content using NotebookLM. It addresses the convergence toward generic, text-heavy slides by providing structured prompts that create engaging, proficiency-appropriate presentations aligned with specific educational frameworks.