Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wyattowalsh/agents --skill host-panelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wyattowalsh/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyattowalsh/agents/host-panel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyattowalsh/agents/host-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyattowalsh/agents/host-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wyattowalsh/agents/host-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wyattowalsh/agents/host-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.02198 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00440 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00220 |
Grade A, and why
host-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Host Panel
Facilitate research-grounded deliberation across simulated intellectual positions. Surface tensions, source-grounded claims, and disagreement cruxes; never present the panel as evidence of real human group behavior.
Invocation: /host-panel "topic" [format] [num-experts]
Dispatch Table
$ARGUMENTS shape |
Dispatch | Action |
|---|---|---|
| empty | empty-help-gallery |
Show the gallery, defaults, supported formats, and ask for a topic. |
| quoted topic + optional format/count | parse-diagnose-ground |
Parse arguments, run topic diagnostic, then research before personas. |
| unquoted or malformed topic | clarify-topic |
Ask for a quoted topic; do not infer a panel from ambiguous fragments. |
| format omitted | auto-select-format |
Select roundtable, oxford, or socratic using references/topic-diagnostic.md. |
| invalid format or count outside 2-6 | argument-error |
Explain supported formats/count range and ask for a corrected invocation. |
| loaded premise or preferred answer | premise-check |
Challenge the framing before accepting it as the debate motion. |
| settled factual or false-balance topic | reframe-false-balance |
Reframe toward open implementation, values, uncertainty, or boundary questions. |
| Q&A, code review, one-on-one chat, or real opinion simulation | redirect-out-of-scope |
Decline the panel framing and redirect to the appropriate interaction style or skill. |
Empty/Help Gallery
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, present this gallery and wait:
| # | Domain | Topic | Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Technology | "Should foundation model weights be open-sourced?" | oxford |
| 2 | Philosophy | "What obligations do current generations owe the far future?" | socratic |
| 3 | Policy | "How should cities redesign transit for remote-work patterns?" | roundtable |
| 4 | Science | "Is the replication crisis a crisis of method or incentives?" | roundtable |
Defaults: roundtable, 4 experts. Expert range: 2-6. Prefer 4-5; 6 is harder to maintain.
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/evals.json 9.6 KB
- references/archetypes.md 6.7 KB
- references/debate-research.md 5.8 KB
- references/formats.md 4.8 KB
- references/moderator-rules.md 3.2 KB
- references/research-integrity.md 3.5 KB
- references/synthesis.md 2.7 KB
- references/topic-diagnostic.md 3.9 KB
- scripts/asset_toolkit/__init__.py 303 B runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/_shared.py 5.6 KB runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/common.py 3.0 KB runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/package.py 43 KB runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/validate_evals.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/validate_hooks.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/asset_toolkit/validate_skill.py 3.6 KB runs code
- scripts/check.py 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/parse_args.py 3.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A fe6f65ac3a63
host-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository wyattowalsh/agents (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,198 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
exam-forecast
Analyze past exams from the same professor to surface patterns — subject weighting, recurring issue-spot traps, favored hypo types, policy-vs-doctrine mix — and forecast likely emphases for the upcoming exam. Use when the user says "what's on the exam", "analyze past exams", "predict the exam", or shares past exams.
lean-formalize
Develop and verify a mathematical proof in Lean, continue an incomplete Lean project, or audit whether it proves the original statement. Connect actual inputs to intermediate lemmas, assemble the target theorem, check its transitive axioms, and provide a reproducible handoff. Use when Lean is requested or a specific…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.