Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/x-cmd/skill/regex-vs-llm-structured-textnpx skills add x-cmd/skill --skill regex-vs-llm-structured-textgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/x-cmd/skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/x-cmd/skill/regex-vs-llm-structured-text)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/x-cmd/skill/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/x-cmd/skill/regex-vs-llm-structured-text.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01594 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00797 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
regex-vs-llm-structured-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing
A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.
When to Activate
- Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
- Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
- Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
- Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing
Decision Framework
Is the text format consistent and repeating?
├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
│ ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
│ └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly
Architecture Pattern
Source Text
│
▼
[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
│
▼
[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
│
▼
[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
│
├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
│
└── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output
Implementation
1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)
import re
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ParsedItem:
id: str
text: str
choices: tuple[str, ...]
answer: str
confidence: float = 1.0
def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
"""Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
pattern = re.compile(
r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
)
items = []
for match in pattern.finditer(content):
choices = tuple(
c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
)
items.append(ParsedItem(
id=match.group("id"),
text=match.group("text").strip(),
choices=choices,
answer=match.group("answer"),
))
return items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 221 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 1f4338a9d8ee
regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository x-cmd/skill (26 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,594 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hugging-face-stat
获取 Hugging Face 上的模型、数据集和 Space 的统计信息.
gpt-image-2
面向 GPT Image 2 的图像生成 / 编辑技能。可在 3 种环境下使用:(A) Garden 本地模式,通过 OpenAI 兼容接口直接出图并落盘;(B) Host-Native 模式,把本 Skill 当作提示词工程指引,把渲染好的 prompt 交给宿主 Agent 自带的图像工具出图;(C) Advisor 模式,宿主无任何图像工具时退化为高质量 prompt 顾问。涵盖 18 大类、80+ 个结构化模板,覆盖海报 / UI / 产品 / 信息图 / 学术图 / 技术架构图 / 漫画 / 头像 / 流程板 / 电影分镜 / IP 周边 / 编辑工作流等场景。.
developing-genkit-dart
Generates code and provides documentation for the Genkit Dart SDK. Use when the user asks to build AI agents in Dart, use Genkit flows, or integrate LLMs into Dart/Flutter applications.
cherry-electron-dev
Develop, fix, and profile Cherry Studio in a tracked Electron instance. Use for everyday implementation, UI and interaction work, bug fixing, runtime debugging, DevTools inspection, lag or jank investigation, CPU and memory monitoring, leak checks, and startup-performance analysis; reuse a verified workspace instance…
code-mate-codex
Runs Codex CLI non-interactively for code analysis and implementation tasks. Use when the user asks to delegate repository work to Codex or obtain a second coding-agent result.
code-mate-pi
Runs Pi non-interactively and parses its JSON event stream for repository tasks. Use when the user asks to delegate a bounded analysis or implementation task to Pi.