Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add x-cmd/skill --skill verification-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/x-cmd/skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/x-cmd/skill/verification-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/x-cmd/skill/verification-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/x-cmd/skill/verification-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/x-cmd/skill/verification-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/x-cmd/skill/verification-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00682 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to verification-loop — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Loop Skill
A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.
When to Use
Invoke this skill:
- After completing a feature or significant code change
- Before creating a PR
- When you want to ensure quality gates pass
- After refactoring
Verification Phases
Phase 1: Build Verification
# Check if project builds
npm run build 2>&1 | tail -20
# OR
pnpm build 2>&1 | tail -20
If build fails, STOP and fix before continuing.
Phase 2: Type Check
# TypeScript projects
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -30
# Python projects
pyright . 2>&1 | head -30
Report all type errors. Fix critical ones before continuing.
Phase 3: Lint Check
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npm run lint 2>&1 | head -30
# Python
ruff check . 2>&1 | head -30
Phase 4: Test Suite
# Run tests with coverage
npm run test -- --coverage 2>&1 | tail -50
# Check coverage threshold
# Target: 80% minimum
Report:
- Total tests: X
- Passed: X
- Failed: X
- Coverage: X%
Phase 5: Security Scan
# Check for secrets
grep -rn "sk-" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "api_key" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
# Check for console.log
grep -rn "console.log" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
Phase 6: Diff Review
# Show what changed
git diff --stat
git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
Review each changed file for:
- Unintended changes
- Missing error handling
- Potential edge cases
Output Format
After running all phases, produce a verification report:
VERIFICATION REPORT
==================
Build: [PASS/FAIL]
Types: [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
Lint: [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
Tests: [PASS/FAIL] (X/Y passed, Z% coverage)
Security: [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
Diff: [X files changed]
Overall: [READY/NOT READY] for PR
Issues to Fix:
1. ...
2. ...
Continuous Mode
For long sessions, run verification every 15 minutes or after major changes:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 01a9ae310ad4
verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository x-cmd/skill (26 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 682 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to verification-loop, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cherry-regression-test
Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.
superpowers-test-driven-development
Writing or fixing any code? Load first — write the failing test before the code.
superpowers-verification-before-completion
About to say done, fixed, or passing? STOP. Load first, show real evidence.
constraint-driven-development
Use when an Android project has no written quality bar, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when coverage, performance, or accessibility should become enforced gates instead of per-PR arguments, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, or when a threshold…
android-device-testing
Use when writing or debugging instrumented tests (Espresso, UI Automator, Compose test rules), using ADB, managing emulators, or inspecting UI with Layout Inspector.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing new features or fixing bugs. Write tests before implementation following Red-Green-Refactor. Covers JUnit5, MockK, Compose test rules, and the Prove-It pattern for bugs.