Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/xaiht/tlamatini/security_auditnpx skills add XAIHT/Tlamatini --skill security_auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XAIHT/TlamatiniWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xaiht/tlamatini/security_audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xaiht/tlamatini/security_audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xaiht/tlamatini/security_audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01327 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Audit
Run a defensive, read-only security sweep over ${input.path}. This skill is
for authorized auditing of code you own or are permitted to test. Never use it
to evade detection or attack third-party systems.
Procedure
- Detect available scanners. Probe PATH (
where <tool>on Windows,which <tool>elsewhere) for each candidate. If${input.tools}is set, restrict to that subset. Skip any tool that is not installed — note it in the summary rather than failing. - Pick scanners by content. Run only what fits the target:
- Python present →
bandit -r "${input.path}" -f json(SAST) and, for dependency files,pip-audit -r <requirements file>orpip-auditin a project dir. - JS/TS present →
npx eslint "${input.path}" -f jsonif an eslint config exists. - Any language →
semgrep --config auto --json "${input.path}"when semgrep is installed (falls back to--config p/cioffline). - Secrets →
gitleaks detect --source "${input.path}" --report-format json(ortrufflehog filesystem) to catch committed credentials/keys. - Always run
ruff check "${input.path}" --output-format jsonwhen Python is present — its security-adjacent lint rules (S-prefixed) are cheap signal.
- Python present →
- Run each scanner via
chat_agent_executer. Capture stdout even on a non-zero exit code — most of these tools exit non-zero precisely because they found issues. Truncate any single tool's raw output to ~16000 chars before parsing. - Normalise findings into one shape:
{tool, file, line, severity, rule_id, message}. Map each tool's native severity ontocritical | high | medium | low. Treat any committed secret/credential ascritical. - Filter & count. Drop findings below
${input.min_severity}. Produceseverity_counts = {critical, high, medium, low}. - Summarise for action. Lead with the count of critical/high issues, name the top 3 things to fix first, and list which scanners were unavailable so the reader knows the coverage gaps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 109 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A a3cb157f02ad
security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository XAIHT/Tlamatini (16 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,327 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
Release a new version of the project.
commit
Inspect git status, draft a commit message that matches the repo's style, and commit staged changes.
review
Review current code changes for bugs, regressions, test gaps, and project-guideline violations.
trend-analysis
基于多维度数据进行分级评估与趋势预测,通过设定差异化增长率计算预测值,并生成对比可视化图表,适用于绩效评估、目标设定等场景。.
large-file-parquet-analysis-and-highlight
当Excel文件总行数超过1万行时,通过转换为Parquet格式提升读取性能,提取目标指标并计算最大值,最后将结果输出为Excel并对特定行进行高亮标注。.
excel-basic-statistics-and-routing
Skill "excel-basic-statistics-and-routing" from OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills, covering skill steps, 保存区间提取与汇总结果 and 保存筛选与统计结果.