Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xAmirHamza77/ReverseOps-Skill --skill competition-bundle-sourcemap-recoverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xAmirHamza77/ReverseOps-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xamirhamza77/reverseops-skill/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xamirhamza77/reverseops-skill/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xamirhamza77/reverseops-skill/competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition Bundle Sourcemap Recovery
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when runtime truth lives in built assets, source maps, chunk tables, or obfuscated loader flow rather than in checked-in source alone.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Start from the served artifact set: entry HTML, build manifest, bootstrap bundle, chunk map, and source maps.
- Record chunk ids, route chunks, loader functions, endpoint strings, and config keys before broad manual deobfuscation.
- Reconstruct the smallest runtime graph that explains which asset executes now.
- Keep served artifact truth separate from repository source unless parity is proven.
- Reproduce the smallest asset-to-runtime boundary that proves the decisive behavior.
Workflow
1. Map The Served Artifact Set
- Record entry HTML, script tags, preload hints, manifest files, asset map, chunk registry, and source map URLs.
- Note framework-specific artifacts such as route manifests, client reference manifests, or lazy-loader tables when present.
- Keep emitted filenames, hash suffixes, and route ownership tied together.
2. Reconstruct Runtime Structure
- Follow bootstrap code, chunk loaders, module registry, string decoders, and lazy import boundaries.
- Use source maps, manifest files, and stable symbol clusters to recover route names, API calls, feature flags, and hidden panels.
- Distinguish build-time intent from the bundle that is actively served now.
3. Reduce To The Decisive Bundle Path
- Compress the result to the smallest sequence: served asset -> loader path -> module or symbol -> runtime effect.
- State clearly whether the decisive weakness lives in manifest drift, chunk loading, hidden route code, string decoding, or stale source assumptions.
- If the task shifts from built assets to SSR or template enforcement, hand back to the tighter template-render skill.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 51 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 8f89baa5ea28
competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery is a skill published in the GitHub repository xAmirHamza77/ReverseOps-Skill (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-bundle-sourcemap-recovery, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
a11y-debugging
Uses Chrome DevTools MCP for accessibility (a11y) debugging and auditing based on web.dev guidelines. Use when testing semantic HTML, ARIA labels, focus states, keyboard navigation, tap targets, and color contrast.
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
threejs-performance
A guide for making Three.js and React Three Fiber 3D projects run more smoothly. Three.js is a JavaScript library for displaying 3D graphics in a browser, while React Three Fiber connects it to React.
performance-profiler
Profile and optimize application performance including load times, memory usage, and rendering. Use when debugging slow performance, memory leaks, or optimizing app speed.
html-portal-generator
Convert a codebase into a self-contained HTML portal app for ingestion into AI application systems. Produces a single deployable HTML file with embedded CSS, JS, and data.
interacting-with-project-runtime
Interacting with a project's JVM runtime through the Kotlin REPL to execute focused probes against project classes and dependencies. Activate when behavior must be observed by running code; use using-gradle for build inspection or task execution.