cheat-learn-from

cheat-learn-from is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content. It costs 0 tokens per session (4,532 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for learning patterns from another content creator’s scripts and performance data. It turns those examples into notes and evaluation rules for the cheat-on-content tool.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps import pasted scripts or local video samples, transcribe videos when needed, compare examples, identify recurring patterns, and update benchmark, script-pattern, rubric, and state files.
Why use it?
A new project may not have enough of its own history to judge what works. Importing a few high-, medium-, and low-performing examples provides an initial reference that can later be reviewed and adjusted.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/xbuilderlab/cheat-on-content/cheat-learn-from
Any agent
npx skills add XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content --skill cheat-learn-from
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 0 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,532 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.04532
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.02266
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00906
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00453

Measured 3d ago against content hash ca9aa5d7b8f1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cheat-learn-from scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/cheat-learn-from/SKILL.md · 400 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 400 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/cheat-learn-from — 对标账号导入

工具早期最重要的信号源是对标账号——你 init 完没数据,rubric 等权 v0 等于占星。但如果你能找一个你想做成那样的账号,导入 5-10 条它的高/中/低样本,工具就有了 anchor。

后期当你自己 calibration_samples ≥ 10 时,benchmark 影响自然减弱——你的真实数据成为主要信号源。但 benchmark.md 不删,仍是 cheat-seed brainstorm 的 reference frame。

Overview

[用户:学这个账号 / 启动 cheat-learn-from]
  ↓
[Phase 0: 检查 benchmark 状态]
  ↓
[Phase 1: 选 input 方式(Way a 默认)]
  ↓
[Phase 2: 收集材料]
  Way a: 用户粘 N 条 script 文本 + 数据
  Way b: 用 whisper 转录 samples/ 目录里的视频
  ↓
[Phase 3: 询问每条样本的"印象判断"(高/中/低 + 为啥)]
  ↓
[Phase 4: Claude 拆 pattern + 派生 rubric 信号]
  ↓
[Phase 5: 用户 review → 改 → 落盘]
  ↓
[Phase 6: 写 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md]
  ↓
[Phase 7: 更新 state.benchmark_status]

Constants

  • MIN_SAMPLES = 3 — 最少 3 条样本(少于拆不出 pattern)
  • RECOMMENDED_SAMPLES = 5-10 — 推荐区间,平衡信号量 vs 用户工作量
  • MAX_SAMPLES_PER_RUN = 15 — 单次导入上限——再多 Claude context 不够 + 用户也累
  • DEFAULT_WAY = a — Way a 简单 + 准确,是 default

Inputs

必填 来源
<账号名> 用户参数;缺失则询问
.cheat-state.json 状态文件
Way a: 用户粘的 script 文本 + 数据 对话
Way b: samples/<账号名>/*.mp4 等视频文件 用户提前下载好放进去

Workflow

Phase 0: 检查 benchmark 状态

.cheat-state.jsonbenchmark_status

状态 处理
none 首次导入——继续 Phase 1
pending 用户之前答应等下找——继续 Phase 1
imported 已有 benchmark 询问"你已有 benchmark [当前名],N 条样本。要做什么? a) 追加新视频到当前 benchmark b) 替换为新 benchmark c) 只看不改"

参数解析:

  • --append → 追加到现有 benchmark
  • --replace <new-name> → 用新 benchmark 替换(旧的归档到 benchmark.archived/)
  • 没标志 + 已有 benchmark → 走上面询问

Phase 1: 选 input 方式(两个独立维度

每条样本 = script + 数据。两者怎么拿是独立的——你可以混搭。

Phase 1a: script source(怎么拿稿子)
script 怎么拿?

a) **粘文本(最简单,推荐)**
   - 你自己整理过 / 用工具提取过——直接粘进对话
   - 工具推荐(按方便程度排):
   
     抖音 / 小红书:
     - 微信小程序「轻抖」—— 粘视频链接 → 自动提取文案 + 评论。最快
     - 类似工具:"视频解析助手" / "短视频文案提取" 等小程序
     - 通常有免费额度,重度使用收费
     
     B 站 / YouTube:
     - 视频页面有"显示字幕/文字记录"按钮(如果 UP 主开了)
     - 第三方:DownSub / SaveSubs / yt-dlp --write-auto-sub
     
     公众号 / Substack:
     - 直接复制网页文字
   
b) **whisper 转录视频文件**
   - 你下载了视频到 samples/<账号名>/<video>/source.mp4
   - 需要装 whisper-cpp + ffmpeg(见 adapters/script-extraction/whisper/README.md)
   - 转录可能有错别字 / 漏字 / 标点不准——准确度比 a 差

c) **跳过 script,只用元数据 + 印象**
   - 你拿不到稿子也懒得用工具
   - 后果:pattern 拆不深(只能看标题 / 数据 / 你的印象),但 rubric 信号还行
   - 适合"先快速搭起来,将来补"

回 a / b / c。

Read the full file on GitHub · 400 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 400 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ca9aa5d7b8f1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cheat-learn-from is a skill published in the GitHub repository XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content (6,715 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,532 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens