Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xg-gh-25/SwarmAI --skill s_browser-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xg-gh-25/SwarmAIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xg-gh-25/swarmai/s_browser-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xg-gh-25/swarmai/s_browser-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xg-gh-25/swarmai/s_browser-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xg-gh-25/swarmai/s_browser-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xg-gh-25/swarmai/s_browser-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00145 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
browser-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Browser Agent
This skill loads full instructions on activation. Read INSTRUCTIONS.md before proceeding.
TRIGGER: "browse", "open website", "browser agent", "web automation", "fill form online", DO NOT USE: for simple URL fetching (use WebFetch), macOS app UI automation (use peekaboo),
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 582133b37e2c
browser-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository xg-gh-25/SwarmAI (55 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 145 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sidekick-audit
Deterministic UI quality audit of a web page or a whole product — WCAG 2.2 A/AA accessibility (axe-core), Core Web Vitals (LCP/CLS), browser health (console errors, failed requests, mixed content) and tap-target size — reported dimensions-first, with confirmed-vs-uncertain findings clustered into root-cause families…
sidekick-test
Goal-based end-to-end UI testing that PROVES the outcome. Given a URL and a plain-language goal (e.g. 'sign up, create a project, and invite a teammate'), sidekick drives a real browser to do it and then verifies success with a DETERMINISTIC signal on the real page — the execution agent is never allowed to grade its…
sidekick-benchmark
Time-to-Capability benchmark — run the SAME user goal against different products or releases and compare how hard each makes it: elapsed time, interaction count, credential steps, forced onboarding screens and documentation detours. Use when the user wants a release-to-release UX regression check ('did this goal get…
computer-use
A guide to building agents that operate graphical interfaces through screenshots, mouse actions, keyboard input, and waits. It explains how to identify interface elements and safely repeat the observe, decide, and act cycle.
computer-use
Read and drive native desktop apps through the accessibility layer — list apps, snapshot a window as a numbered element tree, then click/type/scroll/drag by element index or screen coordinates. Use for a desktop app, not a web page. macOS + Windows; off unless enabled in Settings.
feature-demo-recording
Record a demo video of a web feature from a real browser. Two modes -- a NARRATED film where measured voiceover drives the timeline (designed slides, subtitles, punch-in camera, rendered from an HTML timeline), and a SILENT evidence clip for a PR or a QA pass. Use when the user asks to record a video, demo, or screen…