Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica --skill software-design-demand-survey-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multicaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-design-demand-survey-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-design-demand-survey-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-design-demand-survey-methodology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-design-demand-survey-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-design-demand-survey-methodology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00625 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
software-design-demand-survey-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Demand Survey Methodology
Overview
This is the architect profile's 需求调研阶段方法论 skill.
It is the correct entry point when the architect must start from the original business problem rather than from an already-approved design package.
When to Use
Use when:
- the business problem is still vague
- there is no reliable demand-research document yet
- the architect needs to clarify current state, target state, benefits, risks, red lines, and ROI before solution design starts
Canonical Stage Doctrine (Full Preservation)
一、需求调研
时间：需求或者问题发生并提出时
输入：业务方&各参与方问题、需求与痛点
输出：业务需求调研文档
过程：
需求承接过程中，另外一个目的是帮业务方解决问题而不仅仅是回答问题，多聊几句多往前走几步，了解其核心诉求、前因后果后进行全局规划。一些无脑需求需要让需求方梳理清楚现状是什么样的、希望做成什么样、能够带来哪些收益，由此进行开发工作量评估与ROI确认。
| 角色 | 阶段 | 类型 | 问题 | 答案 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 业务方 | - 需求了解 基于什么背景有什么问题，想要我们做什么（我们能做什么） | who | 什么团队、做什么业务？ | |
| why | 业务背景是什么？ | |||
| 现状是什么/有什么问题（核心诉求）？ | ||||
| 希望做什么改变并带来哪些收益？ | ||||
| 这个需求是否涉及资金安全、权限、合规、审计、外部监管或其他高风险场景？ | ||||
| 研发 | - 需求评估 基于问题和期望，评估哪些能解决、哪些不能解决 | what | 评估哪些能解决？ 用什么方案解，收益是什么 | |
| 评估哪些不能解决？ 有没有其他方式解，业务能否接受 | ||||
| 这件事情的业务红线是什么？哪些结果是绝对不能接受的？ | ||||
| 如果方案失败，失败成本是什么？影响范围、影响对象、恢复要求分别是什么？ | ||||
| 开发工作量评估与ROI确认 | ||||
| - 方案梳理 不用一上来就满足所有诉求，避免投入没有产出 | how | 面向业务方可理解的解决方案是什么？ 提供结果预期，给出衡量指标 | ||
| 推进策略是什么？ 优先满足当前最迫切、最能给解决问题的部分 | ||||
| 有哪些todo事项、跟进人是谁、截止日期是什么时候？ | ||||
| 结果交付 | 业务需求调研文档 包括需求背景、需求评估、方案确认、调研总结等 |
Architect Execution Layer
What this stage really accomplishes
This stage converts business complaint / wish / requirement into a designable problem statement.
Architect obligations
- identify whether the ask is a symptom or a root problem
- force current-state vs target-state clarity
- surface business red lines, failure cost, and risk exposure
- refuse to enter solution design on a vague research package
Exit condition
Do not leave this stage until the architect can clearly state:
- what problem is actually being solved
- why it matters now
- what result counts as success
- what cannot be broken
- what constraints shape the design space
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 114 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 14dcd2654424
software-design-demand-survey-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica (26 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,250 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cw-gates
Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.
interview
Ask one useful structured question at a time only when material product/implementation choices are genuinely missing; remember answers and produce a brief/spec. Discoverable facts should be investigated instead of asked.
verify
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
mcp-host-styling-integration
Integrates MCP App UI with host theming system. Applies host CSS variables, handles onhostcontextchanged, safe area insets, display mode detection, and fullscreen configuration.
quality-hooks
Language-specific auto-lint/format/typecheck pipeline. Supports Python (ruff+pyright), TypeScript (prettier+eslint+tsc), Go (gofmt+golangci-lint). Auto-fix and convergence loops.
dd-synthesis
Synthesize findings from multiple specialist agents into a coherent investment recommendation. Use when combining reports from 9+ specialist agents into a single decision document.