Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica --skill software-development-normsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multicaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-development-norms)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-development-norms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-development-norms/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-development-norms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica/software-development-norms.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.06723 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.03361 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01345 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00672 |
Grade A, and why
software-development-norms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 839 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Software Development Norms
Industrial-grade software engineering rules abstracted from the Alibaba Java Development Handbook (Huangshan Edition). Every principle is language-agnostic; each rule uses a single illustrative example instead of cross-language comparison.
Overview
The Alibaba Java Development Handbook is a benchmark for enterprise-grade coding standards in China. Its rules are rooted in engineering wisdom — not language-specific syntax. This skill distills those rules into universal principles and warns against common anti-patterns that appear across codebases.
When you write code in any language, load this skill to check your work against battle-tested norms.
When to Use
- Writing new code in any language and want to follow professional conventions
- Reviewing code for quality, readability, and robustness
- Onboarding onto a project and need to internalize its baseline quality bar
- Refactoring code and want to avoid introducing anti-patterns
- Deciding on naming, error handling, concurrency, or project structure conventions
Do NOT use for:
- Language-specific style guide enforcement (use language linters instead)
- Debating syntax preferences that have no engineering impact
1. Naming
1.1 No abbreviations that obscure meaning
Principle: Names must be self-documenting. Never abbreviate by dropping letters arbitrarily — the reader must understand the intent without guessing.
# Good
remaining_retry_count = 3
pull_code_from_remote_repository()
# Bad
rmng_rtry_cnt = 3
a = 3
Anti-pattern: AbsClass for AbstractClass, condi for condition. If you can't say it out loud without explaining the abbreviation, the name is wrong.
1.2 Consistent naming conventions per scope
Principle: Each scope (package/module, class/struct, method/function, constant, variable) follows a single convention within the project. Mixed conventions create cognitive load.
Project rule: Define one naming convention per scope and apply it consistently across the repository.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 839 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 671b90447caf
software-development-norms is a skill published in the GitHub repository xiaohei-info/oh-my-multica (26 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 6,723 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cw-slice
Use before writing code for any Codewhale feature, upgrade, or refactor: find the existing owner of the behavior, bound the change to one reviewable slice, and fix the evidence bar before you start.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
review
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or…
simplify
Improve clarity and reduce needless complexity after behavior is understood; preserve behavior and keep cleanup separate from correctness fixes.
codebase-sync
Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.
code-review-patterns
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.