Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xin-lai/CodeSpirit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xin-lai/CodeSpirit/master/.cursor/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xin-lai/CodeSpiritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01809 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00905 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 190 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 40a6e1d5293f
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository xin-lai/CodeSpirit (56 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,809 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
evjs
Develop, migrate, review, document, or debug evjs applications and framework code involving file-based pages, ev.config.ts, server functions, API routes, rendering, plugins, development, builds, and deployment.
code-review-expert
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
obto-feedback
This skill should be used whenever an agent works on an OBTO app that people review through DevZone — when the user mentions reviewers, feedback, "what did they circle", marked-up screenshots, or asks what needs fixing; when a tool result carries "[obto-feedback] N open reviewer feedback item(s)"; when the Agent…
web-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
pr-review-response
Teaches agents to reply to PR review comment threads after fixing issues, making resolutions traceable.