Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xin-lai/CodeSpirit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xin-lai/CodeSpirit/master/.cursor/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xin-lai/CodeSpiritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xin-lai/codespirit/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01809 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00724 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 190 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 40a6e1d5293f
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository xin-lai/CodeSpirit (56 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,809 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
sublime-detection-engineering
Load when the prompt's first line is Sublime detection proposal . Turns one confirmed malicious email into a tested Sublime MQL detection rule proposal: read what made the message malicious, check what already catches it, author MQL, validate the syntax, prove it matches the source message, backtest it over history…
evjs
Develop, migrate, review, document, or debug evjs applications and framework code involving file-based pages, ev.config.ts, server functions, API routes, rendering, plugins, development, builds, and deployment.
code-review-expert
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
review-changes
Review changes against file-specific toolkit rules. Trigger for code-review and quality-check requests. Do not trigger when the user asks to generate a project or author coding rules.
obto-feedback
This skill should be used whenever an agent works on an OBTO app that people review through DevZone — when the user mentions reviewers, feedback, "what did they circle", marked-up screenshots, or asks what needs fixing; when a tool result carries "[obto-feedback] N open reviewer feedback item(s)"; when the Agent…