Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xingwudao/open-xquant --skill evaluate-cross-sectionalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xingwudao/open-xquantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xingwudao/open-xquant/evaluate-cross-sectional)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xingwudao/open-xquant/evaluate-cross-sectional"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xingwudao/open-xquant/evaluate-cross-sectional/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xingwudao/open-xquant/evaluate-cross-sectional"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xingwudao/open-xquant/evaluate-cross-sectional.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00615 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
evaluate-cross-sectional scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluate Cross-Sectional Factor
Use this when the factor ranks assets on the same date.
Minimal SDK Pattern
import pandas as pd
from oxq.data.market import LocalMarketDataProvider
from oxq.factor_eval.metrics import (
compute_decay,
compute_ic,
compute_icir,
compute_rank_ic,
compute_turnover,
)
symbols = ["SPY", "QQQ", "IWM"]
market = LocalMarketDataProvider(data_dir="/path/to/parquet")
factor_df = pd.DataFrame()
prices_df = pd.DataFrame()
for sym in symbols:
bars = market.get_bars(sym, "2018-01-01", "2024-12-31")
prices_df[sym] = bars["close"]
factor_df[sym] = bars["close"].pct_change(20)
factor_df = factor_df.dropna()
prices_df = prices_df.loc[factor_df.index]
forward_returns = prices_df.pct_change(1).shift(-1).dropna()
common = factor_df.index.intersection(forward_returns.index)
factor_df = factor_df.loc[common]
forward_returns = forward_returns.loc[common]
ic = compute_ic(factor=factor_df, forward_returns=forward_returns)
rank_ic = compute_rank_ic(factor=factor_df, forward_returns=forward_returns)
icir = compute_icir(ic["mean"], ic["std"])
decay = compute_decay(factor=factor_df, prices=prices_df, horizons=[1, 3, 5, 10, 20])
turnover = compute_turnover(factor=factor_df)
Review Checklist
- enough symbols for cross-sectional claims
- no forward-return leakage
- factor and returns aligned on common dates
- NaN rows removed deliberately
- multiple horizons checked
- turnover considered with likely trading cost
Interpretation
Use thresholds as heuristics, not rules:
- IC mean above
0.03: promising - IC mean between
0.01and0.03: weak but worth inspecting - ICIR below
0.1: unstable - high turnover: likely cost-sensitive even with positive IC
- fast decay: signal may require execution assumptions the backtest cannot meet
Report Shape
Include:
- factor name and formula
- symbols and date range
- number of dates and symbols
- horizon results
- IC mean, IC std, ICIR, Rank IC
- turnover
- decay pattern
- pass, weak, or fail conclusion with caveats
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 88 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 874c8c781db9
evaluate-cross-sectional is a skill published in the GitHub repository xingwudao/open-xquant (127 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 615 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
A framework for judging Chinese A-share stocks that have reached the daily price-rise limit, using market mood, sector leadership, and trading momentum.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
vectorbt
High-performance vectorized backtesting with parameter optimization, portfolio simulation, and rich performance metrics.