Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Xipher-Labs/walter-os --skill medical-data-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xipher-Labs/walter-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/medical-data-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/medical-data-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/medical-data-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/medical-data-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xipher-labs/walter-os/medical-data-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.02522 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01261 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00504 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
medical-data-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 292 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 03bbb589a722
medical-data-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository Xipher-Labs/walter-os (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 2,522 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
consent
A consent manager for allowing or withdrawing permission to process learning and behavior data. Consent means a person actively agrees to this data use.
compliance-check
Validate codebase against code-level compliance signals for regulatory frameworks (FedRAMP, FIPS, OWASP, SOC 2). Scoped to source code analysis only — not a compliance certification.
local-legal-seo-audit
Audit and improve local SEO for law firms, attorneys, forensic experts and legal/professional services sites with local presence, focusing on GBP, directories, E-E-A-T and practice/location pages.
EU AI Act High-Risk Obligations
PASS/FAIL/N/A checklist for the high-risk AI obligations under Articles 8-15 of the EU AI Act, plus the quality management system, conformity assessment, registration, post-market monitoring, and incident reporting.
EU AI Act Risk Classification
Decision tree for classifying an AI system into the EU AI Act risk tier (unacceptable/high/limited/minimal) and identifying the actor role (provider/deployer/importer/distributor).
EU AI Act Transparency
Checklist for the Article 50 transparency obligations — chatbot AI disclosure, machine-readable marking of synthetic content, emotion-recognition/biometric-categorisation notice, and deepfake/public-interest-text labelling.