Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xmm/codex-bmad-skills --skill bmad-developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xmm/codex-bmad-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xmm/codex-bmad-skills/bmad-developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xmm/codex-bmad-skills/bmad-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xmm/codex-bmad-skills/bmad-developer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xmm/codex-bmad-skills/bmad-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xmm/codex-bmad-skills/bmad-developer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 175 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A eaddf265806a
bmad-developer is a skill published in the GitHub repository xmm/codex-bmad-skills (46 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,166 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bmad-walkthrough
Walk the user through reviewing a change: what it is for, what to look at closely, and how to test it. Use when the user says "walkthrough", "walk me through this change", or "human review".
muse-delegate
Delegate a coding task to Muse Code (muse) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Muse — phrasings like "have Muse do X", "delegate this to Muse", "run it through Muse", or "use Muse to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants…
gentle-ai
Use Gentle AI harness discipline for Pi work: clarify first, preserve OpenSpec artifacts, use strict TDD where available, delegate through subagents when useful, and protect review workload.
respond-review
Act on a reviewer agent's feedback systematically — categorize findings, apply fixes, verify tests still pass. Use after request-review returns a report, or when user wants to work through code review findings.
auto-test-code
A structured process for critically reviewing and testing software code. It records review findings, test plans, commands, results, and supporting files in a project workspace.
review
Review current code changes for bugs, regressions, test gaps, and project-guideline violations.