Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xonika9/agent-skills --skill x9-decision-mapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xonika9/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xonika9/agent-skills/x9-decision-map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xonika9/agent-skills/x9-decision-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xonika9/agent-skills/x9-decision-map/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xonika9/agent-skills/x9-decision-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xonika9/agent-skills/x9-decision-map.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00634 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00317 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
x9-decision-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Decision map
Create, find, read, and update the durable decision map for a large initiative before turning it into an implementation plan. This skill is model-invoked in Claude Code and Codex; its portable claim is structural Agent Skills compatibility only.
Use this only when unresolved choices can materially change an initiative's direction, scope, or plan. A request to design a recurring, multi-stage agent workflow belongs to x9-loop-engineering, even if it also has open decisions.
Durable map
Read the map format before creating or changing a map. Use a canonical initiative ID and retain former names and aliases so later sessions can recover the same artifact.
First follow the repository's local documentation convention. If it does not designate a location for decision maps, use docs/decision-maps/<stable-slug>.md.
Search existing maps by canonical initiative ID before searching aliases and former names. When one map matches, use it. When several candidates plausibly match, show the candidate paths and initiative IDs, ask the user to choose one, and do not create or update a map until they do. Absence of a confident match permits a new map.
Reading and reporting a map are safe. Create or update a local map only when the user requested a durable map; re-read the live artifact immediately before writing. Do not send, publish, or change external systems without separate authority.
Keep four kinds of state distinct:
- a
decisionselects or rejects an option under named authority; - a
sharp open questionhas an answer that can resolve a named decision; fogis material uncertainty that is not yet sharp enough to answer;frontieris the nearest evidence-gathering or decision-unblocking work, not an implementation plan.
When evidence changes, retain the old evidence and decision history. Mark every dependent decision, question, fog item, and frontier entry visibly invalidated or needing review; replace none silently. Then refresh the frontier from the still-current dependencies.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 38 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A d91e2d657551
x9-decision-map is a skill published in the GitHub repository xonika9/agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 634 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
e2e-automator
Build robust end-to-end test suites with Playwright or Cypress. Covers page objects, fixtures, visual testing, and CI integration.
architecture-decision-records
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
agent-framework-azure-ai-py
Build persistent agents on Azure AI Foundry using the Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK.
agent-harness-fault-injection
Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.
api-security
Authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, and SOAP APIs: discovery, authentication and authorization flaws (BOLA/IDOR, JWT/OAuth), rate-limit testing, and a structured multi-phase methodology.
aria
Designs the data model, API contracts, and structural foundation of the system.