Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add XPOZpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills --skill geo-visibility-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XPOZpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xpozpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills/geo-visibility-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xpozpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills/geo-visibility-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xpozpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills/geo-visibility-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xpozpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills/geo-visibility-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xpozpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills/geo-visibility-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00826 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
geo-visibility-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 73 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 0bcc9b34b5bb
geo-visibility-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository XPOZpublic/xpoz-clawhub-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 826 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
geo-platform-optimizer
Platform-specific AI search optimization — audit and optimize for Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Bing Copilot individually.
geo-audit
Comprehensive GEO audit diagnosing why AI systems cannot discover, cite, or recommend a website — scores technical, content, schema, and brand dimensions with a prioritized fix plan. Use when the user mentions GEO audit, AI visibility, AI search optimization, AI citability, or provides a URL and asks why AI can't…
geo-fix-content
Rewrite website content to maximize AI citability — remove hedge language, add data support, improve self-containment, and optimize structure for AI engines. Use when the user asks to improve content for AI, fix citability, rewrite for AI, remove hedge words, or make content more citable.
geo-compare
Compare GEO scores across 2-3 competing websites side by side — identify where competitors lead and where you should focus optimization efforts. Use when the user asks to compare sites for AI visibility, benchmark against competitors, or mentions competitor analysis for AI search.
geo-fix-llmstxt
Generate llms.txt and llms-full.txt files for a website to improve AI discoverability. Use when the user asks to create llms.txt, generate llms.txt, fix llms.txt, make site AI-readable, or mentions llms.txt generation.
geo-monitor
Re-audit a website and compare scores against a previous GEO audit baseline to track improvement over time. Use when the user asks to re-audit, check progress, track GEO score changes, monitor improvements, or compare before and after optimization.