Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add XRenSiu/claude-code-forge --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XRenSiu/claude-code-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/executing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/executing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/executing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01322 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00529 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans Skill
快速模式任务执行,适用于 0→1 产品和 MVP 开发
触发条件
- 使用
/pdforge --mode 0to1或--mode fast - 需要快速迭代的 MVP 开发
- 任务计划已准备好待执行
核心流程
1. 加载任务计划
2. 按依赖顺序排序任务
3. 批量执行任务(带检查点验证)
4. 快速验证(轻量级测试)
5. 输出执行报告
执行模式
与 Subagent-Driven Development 的对比
| 维度 | Executing Plans (快速) | Subagent-Driven (高质量) |
|---|---|---|
| 速度 | ⚡ 快 | 🐢 慢 |
| 质量 | 🟡 中等 | 🟢 高 |
| 审查 | 检查点验证 | 每任务双阶段审查 |
| 适用 | 0→1 产品, MVP | 1→100 产品, 关键功能 |
| 覆盖率 | 50% | 80% |
| Token | 较少 | 较多 |
检查点机制
任务 1 → 检查点 1 → 任务 2 → 任务 3 → 检查点 2 → 任务 4 → ...
检查点触发条件:
- 每 3 个任务后
- 高复杂度任务完成后
- 关键路径节点
检查点验证内容:
- 构建是否通过
- 基础测试是否通过
- 是否有明显回归
快速验证 vs 完整审查
| 验证项 | 快速模式 | 完整模式 |
|---|---|---|
| 构建检查 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 类型检查 | ✅ | ✅ |
| 单元测试 | ✅ 核心路径 | ✅ 全部 |
| 集成测试 | ⏭️ 跳过 | ✅ |
| 覆盖率 | 50% | 80% |
| 代码审查 | ⏭️ 跳过 | ✅ 三阶段 |
| 安全扫描 | ⏭️ 基础 | ✅ 完整 |
任务执行流程
FOR 每个任务按依赖顺序:
1. 读取任务规格
2. 分析实现方案
3. 编写代码(可选 TDD)
4. 运行基础验证
IF 检查点:
5a. 运行检查点验证
5b. 如失败 → 回滚到上个检查点
6. 标记任务完成
7. 继续下一个任务
回滚策略
检查点失败时:
- 轻微问题:修复后继续
- 中等问题:回滚到检查点,重试任务
- 严重问题:暂停执行,请求人工干预
输出格式
⚡ 快速执行模式
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📋 计划: docs/plans/auth-plan.json
📊 任务: 8 个
📍 检查点: 3 个
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
任务 1/8: 项目设置 ✅
任务 2/8: 数据库 Schema ✅
任务 3/8: Auth 服务 ✅
📍 检查点 1: ✅ 通过
└── 构建: ✅ | 测试: ✅ (12/12)
任务 4/8: 用户管理 ✅
任务 5/8: API 路由 ✅
任务 6/8: Auth 组件 ✅
📍 检查点 2: ✅ 通过
└── 构建: ✅ | 测试: ✅ (28/28)
任务 7/8: 单元测试 ✅
任务 8/8: 文档 ✅
📍 最终检查点: ✅ 通过
└── 构建: ✅ | 测试: ✅ (42/42) | 覆盖率: 52%
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ 执行完成
├── 任务: 8/8 完成
├── 检查点: 3/3 通过
├── 耗时: 15 分钟
└── 覆盖率: 52% (目标 50%)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
何时使用
适合快速模式
- MVP 快速验证
- 原型开发
- 探索性编码
- 时间紧迫的功能
- 内部工具开发
不适合快速模式
- 关键业务功能
- 支付/安全相关
- 已有用户的产品
- 需要高可靠性的系统
与其他 Skills 的关系
writing-plans → [选择执行模式]
↓
┌───────────────┴───────────────┐
↓ ↓
executing-plans (快速) subagent-driven-development (高质量)
↓ ↓
└───────────────┬───────────────┘
↓
requesting-code-review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 180 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A c360f25b626e
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository XRenSiu/claude-code-forge (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,322 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.