sova: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/sova-review-full/SKILL.md

sova-review-full is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from xsovad06/sova. It costs 34 tokens per session (976 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A pre-push workflow that simplifies changed code, reviews it for problems, and organizes the commits. Commits are saved snapshots of changes in Git, and a pre-push check happens before sharing them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before opening or updating a pull request to clean up implementation details, review the result, and arrange commits clearly.
Why use it?
It combines several quality checks into one process, reducing the chance of pushing overly complex code, missed defects, or messy history.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is xsovad06/sova's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on sova itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything sova configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to xsovad06/sova. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xsovad06/sova/main/.agents/skills/sova-review-full/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xsovad06/sova

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for sova-review-full

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for sova-review-full

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xsovad06/sova/sova-review-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 976 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00976
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00390
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00195
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00098

Measured 14d ago against content hash 7c24baef7efa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

sova-review-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/sova-review-full/SKILL.md · 92 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Full Review Pipeline

Run a complete pre-push quality pipeline: simplify code, review for issues, then organize commits into clean history.

Scope: the arguments provided when this skill is invoked

Phase 1: Simplify

Follow the sova-simplify skill workflow. Review all changed code for opportunities to reduce complexity:

  1. Get the diff scope:

    BASE=$(git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's#^origin/##')
    BASE=${BASE:-main}
    git fetch --quiet origin "$BASE"
    git diff "origin/$BASE"...HEAD --stat
    git diff --cached --stat
    git diff --stat
    
  2. For each changed file, read the entire file and check:

    • Code reuse: does new code duplicate existing utilities or helpers? Search the codebase.
    • Over-engineering: unnecessary abstractions, premature generalization, excessive configurability
    • Dead code: unused imports, unreachable branches, commented-out code
    • Redundancy: repeated logic that could be a shared helper (only if 3+ occurrences)
    • Complexity: can any function be simplified without losing clarity?
    • Efficiency: redundant computations, repeated file reads, duplicate API calls
  3. Apply simplifications directly. After each change, verify tests still pass (see CLAUDE.md for commands).

  4. If no simplifications are needed, state that and move on.

Phase 2: Review

Follow the sova-review skill workflow:

  1. Review all changed files for bugs, security, performance, test coverage, consistency, doc freshness, and scout rule (fix pre-existing issues in touched files).
  2. Score each finding (1-10 priority). Address all findings (fix or acknowledge with justification).
  3. Run the full CI-equivalent checks: make check. Fix any failures before proceeding.
  4. Report findings in the standard review format.

See the sova-review skill for the full review checklist and scoring criteria.

Phase 3: Organize Commits

Follow the sova-rearrange-commits skill workflow:

Read the full file on GitHub · 92 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 14d ago Changed · +3 lines 7c24baef7efa
  2. 16d ago Changed · +1 tokens per session ead276673294
  3. 22d ago First seen · 89 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e3da94c91bff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

sova-review-full is a skill published in the GitHub repository xsovad06/sova (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 976 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-08.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autofix-pr

Watch a pull request and fix it from a worktree of its own - CI failures, review feedback from trusted authors and merge conflicts are fixed, pushed to the PR branch and answered on the PR under the user's git and gh identity. Usage - /autofix-pr [ | ] [--once] [--every ] [--no-reply] [--yes] [instructions]…

QwenLM/qwen-code · 123 tokens

loop-gh-pr

A recipe for a scheduled GitHub pull-request watcher. It checks open pull requests for new activity and prepares read-only review drafts without posting comments or merging anything.

restarter/lets-workflow · 118 tokens

git-iris

Use this skill when generating commit messages, pull request descriptions, release notes, changelogs, or code reviews in a repository where git-iris is available. Activates on requests like "commit this", "write a commit message", "draft a PR", "generate release notes", "write a changelog", or "review my changes" when…

hyperb1iss/git-iris · 81 tokens

requesting-code-review

Use when implementation is done and you need a structured pre-PR review workflow. Triggers: 'ready for review', 'review my changes before PR', 'pre-merge check', 'is this ready', 'submit for review'. NOT for: post-merge review (use code-review) or deciding how to integrate (use finishing-a-development-branch).

axiomantic/spellbook · 77 tokens

fix

Read this repo's open issues, triage them, and open one pull request per issue that can be fixed without a judgement call. Issues that need a decision, or that look stale or superseded, are reported with a recommendation rather than guessed at.

Jebel-Quant/rhiza-claude · 51 tokens

git

This skill should be used when the user asks to "commit changes", "create a pull request", "rebase safely", or performs any git/GitHub operation.

dean0x/devflow · 36 tokens