Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add XSpoonAi/spoon-bot --skill code_reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XSpoonAi/spoon-botWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xspoonai/spoon-bot/code_review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xspoonai/spoon-bot/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xspoonai/spoon-bot/code_review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xspoonai/spoon-bot/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xspoonai/spoon-bot/code_review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
code_review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A bc121d97a605
code_review is a skill published in the GitHub repository XSpoonAi/spoon-bot (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness.
code-review
Automated code review with checklist and quality gates.
code-review
A code-review and quality-analysis skill written in Chinese. It is intended to inspect code, find potential problems, and suggest improvements.
review-loop
Iterative code review — fix P1+P2 until clean, report P3 as an offer.
code-review
Code review for issues, style consistency, best practices—use for full code evaluation; not for debugging specific errors or fixing individual style violations.
code-review
Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or wants autonomous fix-review cycles.