Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xtyooo/specpilot-codex --skill specpilot-updategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xtyooo/specpilot-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xtyooo/specpilot-codex/specpilot-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xtyooo/specpilot-codex/specpilot-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xtyooo/specpilot-codex/specpilot-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xtyooo/specpilot-codex/specpilot-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xtyooo/specpilot-codex/specpilot-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01646 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00658 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
specpilot-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SpecPilot: 更新需求
处理需求变更,根据需求当前状态和变更范围选择合适的处理方式。
参数
the user-provided arguments after the command text- 格式:REQ-xxx [变更内容]或仅REQ-xxx(变更内容在文档中)
使用场景
- 开发中的需求有调整
- 已完成的需求需要修复 bug
- 已完成的需求需要新增功能
- 需求理解有偏差需要修正
变更内容来源(二选一)
- 命令参数直接提供:
/specpilot:update REQ-001 新增xxx功能,修改xxx逻辑 - 在 draft 文件的【变更请求】章节中写明(AI 自动读取)
执行步骤
阶段一:读取需求和变更内容
- 从
the user-provided arguments after the command text解析需求编号和变更内容 - 读取
docs/specpilot/requirements/index.md获取需求当前状态 - 读取草稿文件:
docs/specpilot/requirements/REQ-{编号}-draft.md - 读取项目指南:
docs/specpilot/project-guide.md - 获取变更内容:
- 如果命令参数中包含变更内容,使用参数中的内容
- 否则检查 draft 文件是否有【变更请求】章节
- 如果都没有,提示用户提供变更内容
阶段二:分析变更影响
-
深入分析变更内容:
- 变更涉及哪些功能点
- 变更影响哪些代码文件
- 变更是否改变核心逻辑
- 变更与原需求的关系
-
判断变更类型:
| 变更类型 | 判断标准 | 处理方式 |
|---|---|---|
| Bug 修复 | 代码实现与需求不符,或有逻辑错误 | 原需求追加修复 |
| 需求微调 | 改动 ≤3 个文件,不改变核心逻辑 | 原需求追加修改 |
| 需求新增 | 在原有基础上新增独立功能点 | 建议创建新需求 |
| 需求重做 | 改变核心逻辑,改动 >5 个文件 | 必须创建新需求 |
- 输出分析结果:
## 变更分析 - REQ-{编号}
**当前状态**:{状态}
**变更内容**:{用户提供的变更描述}
### 变更影响分析
**变更类型**:{Bug修复/需求微调/需求新增/需求重做}
**影响范围**:
- 涉及文件:{文件列表}
- 核心逻辑变化:{是/否}
- 预估改动量:{小/中/大}
**处理建议**:{原需求修改 / 创建新需求迭代}
是否同意此处理方式?
阶段三:更新需求文档
情况A:原需求修改(Bug修复/微调)
-
更新 index.md 状态:
- 如果是
completed,改为🔧 updating - 如果是
in_progress,保持不变
- 如果是
-
在 draft 文件中记录变更:
在【需求确认】章节后添加或更新【变更记录】:
---
## 【变更记录】
### 变更 #1 - {日期}
**变更类型**:{Bug修复/需求微调}
**变更原因**:
{为什么需要变更}
**变更内容**:
{具体变更了什么}
**影响范围**:
- 涉及文件:{文件列表}
- 涉及功能:{功能点}
**变更后的需求**:
{更新后的需求描述,整合到原需求中}
-
更新【需求确认】章节:
- 整合变更内容到原有需求确认中
- 更新数据模型、业务规则、数据流等(如有变化)
- 更新涉及代码文件列表
-
进入确认流程:
- 如果变更较复杂,重新进行需求确认(类似 /specpilot:confirm)
- 如果变更简单明确,直接进入执行
情况B:创建新需求迭代(新增/重做)
- 询问用户确认:
该变更涉及较大改动,建议创建新需求进行迭代。
- 原需求:REQ-{编号} - {描述}
- 新需求:REQ-{新编号}(迭代自 REQ-{编号})
是否同意?输入"同意"继续,或"坚持原需求"在原需求上修改。
- 如果同意创建新需求:
- 自动执行类似
/specpilot:new的流程 - 新需求自动填充:
- 关联需求:
迭代自:REQ-{原编号} - 代码位置说明:复制原需求
- 需求内容:包含原需求摘要 + 新变更内容
- 关联需求:
- 更新 index.md 关联关系
- 原需求状态可选改为
🔄 iterated(如果完全替代)
- 自动执行类似
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 217 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 173fd5b46882
specpilot-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository xtyooo/specpilot-codex (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,646 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…