testing-python

A guide to writing Python tests with pytest, a tool for checking that code behaves as expected. It covers focused tests, reusable test setup, variations of the same case, mocked dependencies, and asynchronous code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write, review, debug, and expand pytest test suites, including tests with fixtures, parameterized cases, mocks, and async functions.
Why use it?
It helps make failing tests easier to understand and keeps tests focused on one behavior at a time. That makes Python code easier to check and maintain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/xuansenpa1/skillrevise/testing-python
Any agent
npx skills add xuansenpa1/skillrevise --skill testing-python
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xuansenpa1/skillrevise

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 45 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,211 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00045 $0.01211
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00606
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00242
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00121

Measured 2d ago against content hash 2741f4b02a70, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

testing-python scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to testing-python — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

data/skillsbench/tasks/fix-build-agentops/environment/skills/testing-python/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Writing Effective Python Tests

Core Principles

Every test should be atomic, self-contained, and test single functionality. A test that tests multiple things is harder to debug and maintain.

Test Structure

Atomic unit tests

Each test should verify a single behavior. The test name should tell you what's broken when it fails. Multiple assertions are fine when they all verify the same behavior.

# Good: Name tells you what's broken
def test_user_creation_sets_defaults():
    user = User(name="Alice")
    assert user.role == "member"
    assert user.id is not None
    assert user.created_at is not None

# Bad: If this fails, what behavior is broken?
def test_user():
    user = User(name="Alice")
    assert user.role == "member"
    user.promote()
    assert user.role == "admin"
    assert user.can_delete_others()

Use parameterization for variations of the same concept

import pytest

@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
    ("hello", "HELLO"),
    ("World", "WORLD"),
    ("", ""),
    ("123", "123"),
])
def test_uppercase_conversion(input, expected):
    assert input.upper() == expected

Use separate tests for different functionality

Don't parameterize unrelated behaviors. If the test logic differs, write separate tests.

Project-Specific Rules

No async markers needed

This project uses asyncio_mode = "auto" globally. Write async tests without decorators:

# Correct
async def test_async_operation():
    result = await some_async_function()
    assert result == expected

# Wrong - don't add this
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_async_operation():
    ...

Imports at module level

Put ALL imports at the top of the file:

# Correct
import pytest
from fastmcp import FastMCP
from fastmcp.client import Client

async def test_something():
    mcp = FastMCP("test")
    ...

# Wrong - no local imports
async def test_something():
    from fastmcp import FastMCP  # Don't do this
    ...

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 221 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 2741f4b02a70

Subscribe to this mod's changes

testing-python is a skill published in the GitHub repository xuansenpa1/skillrevise (55 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,211 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to testing-python, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens