Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xushuodasd/VIBE-Claude-Plugin --skill vibe-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xushuodasd/VIBE-Claude-PluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xushuodasd/vibe-claude-plugin/vibe-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xushuodasd/vibe-claude-plugin/vibe-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xushuodasd/vibe-claude-plugin/vibe-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xushuodasd/vibe-claude-plugin/vibe-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xushuodasd/vibe-claude-plugin/vibe-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02604 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01302 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00521 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00260 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to vibe-api-rules — 268 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
代码检查工作流
1. 文档目的
规范代码检查流程,确保前端和后端代码按照开发计划文档进行开发,验证前端与后端的接口调用是否正常,保证项目质量和开发进度。
2. 工作流结构
一个完整的代码检查工作流应包含:
- 基本信息:名称、目标
- 前置步骤:产物检查、依赖项确认
- 执行步骤:详细的执行流程和顺序
- 执行建议:专业建议和注意事项
- 成功标准:任务完成的判定条件
- 失败处理:异常情况的应对措施
- 输出成果:明确的交付物和保存位置
3. 执行要求
- 严格按照步骤执行
- 与用户保持深度沟通
- 记录关键信息和结果
- 遇到异常时按失败处理机制执行
- 确保输出成果符合用户预期
4. 文档管理
- 执行后根据实际情况更新文档
- 进行版本管理,确保使用最新版本
5. 工作流程
前置步骤:准备工作
-
检查项目开发阶段:
- 查看
./.vibe/stage.md文件,确认当前项目开发阶段 - 如果阶段未设定,提示用户先执行项目阶段开发计划工作流
- 查看
-
检查开发计划文档:
- 确认
./项目文档/开发计划/前端开发文档(前端开发计划).md文件是否存在 - 确认
./项目文档/开发计划/后端开发文档(后端开发计划).md文件是否存在 - 确认
./项目文档/开发计划/项目阶段开发计划总览.md文件是否存在 - 如果不存在,提示用户先执行项目阶段开发计划工作流
- 确认
-
检查前端和后端目录:
- 确认
./frontend目录是否存在 - 确认
./backend目录是否存在 - 如果不存在,提示用户先执行前端开发工作流和后端开发工作流
- 确认
-
检查前端和后端开发文档:
- 确认
./frontend/doc目录下是否存在前端开发手册 - 确认
./backend/doc目录下是否存在后端开发手册 - 如果不存在,提示用户先执行前端开发工作流和后端开发工作流
- 确认
第一步:读取相关文档
-
读取开发计划文档:
- 读取
./项目文档/开发计划/前端开发文档(前端开发计划).md文件 - 读取
./项目文档/开发计划/后端开发文档(后端开发计划).md文件 - 读取
./项目文档/开发计划/项目阶段开发计划总览.md文件 - 了解当前阶段的开发任务和要求
- 读取
-
读取前端和后端开发手册:
- 读取
./frontend/doc目录下的前端开发手册 - 读取
./backend/doc目录下的后端开发手册 - 了解前端和后端的技术选型、API调用方式等
- 读取
-
读取API设计规范文档:
- 读取
./.vibe/workflows/api-rules.md文件 - 了解API设计规范和要求
- 读取
第二步:前端代码检查
-
代码结构检查:
- 检查前端代码结构是否符合开发计划文档的要求
- 确认是否按照模块化原则进行开发
- 检查代码文件组织是否合理
-
功能实现检查:
- 检查当前阶段的前端功能是否按照开发计划文档实现
- 确认功能模块是否完整
- 检查功能实现是否符合需求
-
API调用检查:
- 检查前端代码中的API调用是否符合API设计规范
- 确认API调用的参数、路径、方法等是否正确
- 检查API调用的错误处理和异常捕获是否完善
-
代码质量检查:
- 检查前端代码结构是否清晰,逻辑是否流畅
- 检查代码是否符合前端编码规范和最佳实践
- 检查代码的可维护性和可扩展性
-
UI 质量检查(参照
vibe-ui-design第 17 节 Pre-Delivery Checklist):- 视觉规范:颜色/间距/圆角/阴影是否全用 token,无硬编码
- 交互规范:hover/active/disabled 三态是否完整,hover 不改布局
- 可访问性:对比度≥4.5:1,键盘可达,焦点可见
- 响应式:375px/768px/1440px 三档布局不破
- 一致性:Button/Input/Card/Modal 是否全用组件库,无原生标签
-
测试验证:
- 对前端功能进行测试
- 验证功能是否符合需求
- 测试API调用是否正常
第三步:后端代码检查
- 代码结构检查:
- 检查后端代码结构是否符合开发计划文档的要求
- 确认是否按照模块化原则进行开发
- 检查代码文件组织是否合理
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 214 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9306f916e1d6
vibe-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository xushuodasd/VIBE-Claude-Plugin (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,604 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to vibe-api-rules, differing in 268 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
council-review
Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js)…
code-review
Review a change for correctness, edge cases, security, tests, and clarity.
security-review
Review code defensively for injection, secrets, and trust-boundary flaws.
requesting-code-review
Get a fresh-eyes review of your own change before calling it done.
safe-refactoring
Change code structure without changing behaviour — tests green at every step.
lsp-validation
Use Language Server Protocol tools for code validation, navigation, and refactoring. Essential for maintaining code quality.