Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/xvirobotics/metaskill/evaluate-modelnpx skills add xvirobotics/metaskill --skill evaluate-modelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xvirobotics/metaskillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xvirobotics/metaskill/evaluate-model)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xvirobotics/metaskill/evaluate-model"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xvirobotics/metaskill/evaluate-model.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00583 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
evaluate-model scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- evaluate-model — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are running model evaluation for this project. Your goal is to load a trained model checkpoint, evaluate it on the held-out test set, compute comprehensive metrics, and generate a structured report.
Dynamic Context
Current branch: !git branch --show-current
Available checkpoints: !ls checkpoints/*.pt checkpoints/*.pth 2>/dev/null || echo "No checkpoints found"
Test data: !ls data/processed/test* data/features/test* 2>/dev/null || echo "No test data found"
Latest metrics: !ls -t reports/*.json experiments/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -3 || echo "No previous metrics found"
Config files: !ls configs/*.yaml configs/*.toml 2>/dev/null || echo "No configs found"
Checkpoint Selection
If the user provided a checkpoint path as an argument, use it: $ARGUMENTS
Otherwise, find the latest checkpoint:
- Look for
checkpoints/best_model.ptorcheckpoints/best_model.pth - If not found, find the most recently modified
.ptor.pthfile incheckpoints/ - If no checkpoints exist, report the error and stop
Evaluation Process
Step 1: Load and Verify Checkpoint
Verify the checkpoint file exists and can be loaded:
python3 -c "
import torch
ckpt = torch.load('$CHECKPOINT_PATH', map_location='cpu', weights_only=False)
print('Checkpoint keys:', list(ckpt.keys()))
print('Epoch:', ckpt.get('epoch', 'unknown'))
print('Best metric:', ckpt.get('best_metric', 'unknown'))
print('Config:', ckpt.get('config', 'not stored'))
"
Report the checkpoint metadata: epoch, stored metric, config used.
Step 2: Run Evaluation Script
Execute the evaluation:
python3 -m src.models.evaluation.evaluate \
--checkpoint $CHECKPOINT_PATH \
--data-dir data/features/ \
--output-dir reports/ \
--config configs/experiment.yaml
Alternative patterns to try if the above fails:
python3 src/evaluation/evaluate.py --checkpoint $CHECKPOINT_PATHpython3 evaluate.py --checkpoint $CHECKPOINT_PATH --test-data data/features/test.parquet
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 153 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 4796931a15ec
evaluate-model is a skill published in the GitHub repository xvirobotics/metaskill (67 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,166 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
evaluate-model
Load the latest model checkpoint, run evaluation on the test set, and generate a metrics report with confusion matrix. Use this after training to assess model performance or to re-evaluate a specific checkpoint.
run-pipeline
Run the full data science pipeline: validate raw data, preprocess, engineer features, train model, and evaluate. Use this when you want to execute the end-to-end ML pipeline or re-run it after data or code changes.
umap-learn
Use UMAP-learn for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, 2D/3D embeddings, clustering preprocessing, supervised or semi-supervised UMAP, DensMAP, AlignedUMAP, and Parametric UMAP workflows.
optimize-for-gpu
GPU-accelerates scientific Python on NVIDIA hardware and verifies that the result is correct and faster. Use for CUDA/GPU optimization; CPU-bound NumPy, SciPy, pandas, scikit-learn, NetworkX, scikit-image, vector-search, image-processing, graph, simulation, or file-I/O workloads; CuPy, cuDF, cuML, cuGraph, cuVS…
shap
Explain and audit machine-learning predictions with SHAP. Use for selecting SHAP explainers and maskers, computing and validating feature attributions, handling multi-output explanations, and producing local or global SHAP visualizations.
arboreto
Infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from gene expression data using scalable algorithms (GRNBoost2, GENIE3). Use when analyzing transcriptomics data (bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq) to identify transcription factor-target gene relationships and regulatory interactions. Supports distributed computation for…