Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/main/.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/gitnexus-refactoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/gitnexus-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/gitnexus-refactoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/gitnexus-refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp/gitnexus-refactoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00962 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gitnexus-refactoring — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactoring with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Rename this function safely"
- "Extract this into a module"
- "Split this service"
- "Move this to a new file"
- Any task involving renaming, extracting, splitting, or restructuring code
Workflow
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) → Map all dependents
2. query({search_query: "X"}) → Find execution flows involving X
3. context({name: "X"}) → See all incoming/outgoing refs
4. Plan update order: interfaces → implementations → callers → tests
If "Index is stale" → run
node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyzein terminal.
Checklists
Rename Symbol
- [ ] rename({symbol_name: "oldName", new_name: "newName", dry_run: true}) — preview all edits
- [ ] Review graph edits (high confidence) and text_search edits (review carefully)
- [ ] If satisfied: rename({..., dry_run: false}) — apply edits
- [ ] detect_changes() — verify only expected files changed
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Extract Module
- [ ] context({name: target}) — see all incoming/outgoing refs
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) — find all external callers
- [ ] Define new module interface
- [ ] Extract code, update imports
- [ ] detect_changes() — verify affected scope
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Split Function/Service
- [ ] context({name: target}) — understand all callees
- [ ] Group callees by responsibility
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) — map callers to update
- [ ] Create new functions/services
- [ ] Update callers
- [ ] detect_changes() — verify affected scope
- [ ] Run tests for affected processes
Tools
rename — automated multi-file rename:
rename({symbol_name: "validateUser", new_name: "authenticateUser", dry_run: true})
→ 12 edits across 8 files
→ 10 graph edits (high confidence), 2 text_search edits (review)
→ Changes: [{file_path, edits: [{line, old_text, new_text, confidence}]}]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 544841cf90c9
gitnexus-refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository yangjh0127/openapi-docs-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 962 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gitnexus-refactoring, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
scalar-design-system
Scalar's design system — design tokens, theming (@scalar/themes), CSS variables, and the @scalar/components library. Use when designing or implementing Scalar UI, especially with Paper (code-to-design / design-to-code), so output matches real Scalar tokens, colors, typography, spacing, and components instead of…
skmtc-retro-review
Aggregate friction log files across a time period to identify recurring patterns, classify each cluster by intervention type, produce a prioritized action plan with success criteria, and calculate convergence metrics. Complements skmtc-retro (which captures per-session signal) by acting as the system's actuator…
docs-writing
Write, restructure, or review documentation — tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, concept/explanation docs, API references, READMEs, changelogs, release notes, and troubleshooting guides. Distills documentation craft from Mintlify's guides (compiled from technical writers at Stripe, GitHub, Amplitude, and…
api-documentation
API Documentation & Design (OpenAPI/Swagger): Helps write and review API documentation, generate OpenAPI/Swagger specs, design RESTful APIs, and document GraphQL schemas. Use whenever the user mentions 'API docs', 'Swagger', 'OpenAPI', 'API specification', 'API design', 'REST API', 'endpoint documentation', 'API…
open-code-review
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the ocr CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply…
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.